Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question I: What kind of gift wisdom is
IT IS TO BE NOTED with St. Bonaventure de septem Itineribus aeternitatis, Itinere 3. dist. 3. art. 3. et de septem donis, de dono Sapientiae, cap. 1. et 3. p. Centiloquii, sect. 45. et aliis locis, Multas enumerari sapientias. I omit the wisdom of the flesh, an enemy to God, as is said Rom. 8., and the wisdom of this world; which is called by St. James, cap. 3., animal, and diabolical, and by Paul is called foolishness, since it prefers transitory goods to eternal ones, as iron to gold. See St. Bonaventure LL. cc.
Quale donum sit SAPIENTIAE.
NOTANDUM ex D. Bonav. de septem Itineribus aeternitatis, Itinere 3. dist. 3. art. 3. et de septem donis, de dono Sapientiae, cap. 1. et 3. p. Centiloquii, sect. 45. et aliis locis, Multas enumerari sapientias. Omitto Sapientiam carnis, inimicam Deo, ut dicitur Rom. 8. et Sapientiam huius mundi; quae dicitur a D. Iacobo, cap. 3. animalis, et diabolica, et a Paulo dicitur Stultitia, quippe quae bona transitoria aeternis praefert, veluti auro ferrum. Vide D. Bonaventuram LL. cc.
THERE is Uncreated Wisdom, whose panegyrics the author of Sap. cap. 7. wove together: The brightness of eternal light, the unspotted mirror, etc., which the Holy Doctor elegantly pursues in his Commentary, and St. Augustine lib. 1. de Genes. ad litt. cap 5. Now this wisdom is the SON OF GOD, not a Gift, but the Giver of gifts.
EST Sapientia Increata, cuius Panegyricos contexuit Sap. cap. 7. Candor lucis aeternae, speculum sine macula, etc. quae eleganter prosequitur S. Doct. in Commentario, et D. August. lib. 1. de Genes. ad litt. cap 5. Est autem haec sapientia FILIUS DEI, non Donum, sed Donator donorum.
A twofold Created Wisdom is GIVEN: one, which is acquired by human study, and is an intellectual virtue, of which Aristotle lib. 1. Metaph. cap. 2. and St. Augustine lib. 14. de Trinit. cap. 1. say that it is the universal cognition of all things divine and human. This indeed can be called wisdom, because it is sapid knowledge, although not perfectly seasoned; although Aristotle in his Ethics brings forward admirable delights in it, yet St. Thomas adds that these are imperfect, because they are not seasoned with the oil of grace.
DATUR duplex Sapientia Creata: Altera, quae studio humano acquiritur, et est virtus intellectualis, de qua Aristoteles lib. 1. Metaph. cap. 2. et D. August. lib. 14. de Trinit. cap. 1. aiunt, esse universalem cognitionem omnium rerum divinarum, et humanarum. Haec sane potest dici sapientia, quia est sapida scientia, tametsi non perfecte condita: Quamvis admirabiles in ea delectationes afferat Aristoteles in Ethicis; eas tamen imperfectas esse, addit S. Doct. quia non sunt oleo gratiae conditae.
BUT that Wisdom can have a judgment somewhat right concerning divine things, as Hugh shows super caelestem Hierarchiam, cap. 1.
POTEST vero illa Sapientia aliqualiter rectum habere iudicium circa res divinas, ut ostendit Hugo super caelestem Hierarchiam, cap. 1.
There is also that Wisdom which deals with the most abstract and divine things, which Aristotle calls Metaphysics; but we more fittingly name it Theology, at whose splendor earthly wisdom has been eclipsed and has dissolved into fictions. We acquire it, however, with labors, faith presupposed.
Est autem Sapientia, quae de rebus abstractissimis, atque divinis agit, quam Aristoteles Metaphysicam vocat; nos autem aptius Theologiam nuncupamus, ad cuius splendorem eclipsata est, et in figmenta est resoluta terrena sapientia. Eam vero laboribus acquirimus, supposita fide.
FURTHER there is also the other, infused Wisdom, as St. James 3. says, whose object is God, not under the aspect of the naked true, but of the true as to be tasted for good; and this is truly Sapid Knowledge. Of this Sap. 11.: The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the Spirit of Wisdom, etc.
PORRO est etiam altera Sapientia infusa, ut ait. Iacobi 3. cuius obiectum est Deus, non sub ratione nudi veri, sed veri, ut ad bonum degustandum; et haec est vere Sapida Scientia. De hac Sap. 11. Requiescet super eum Spiritus Domini, Spiritus Sapientiae, etc.
The act of THIS is to contemplate God, not in any manner whatever, but from love with a certain experimental sweetness and affection. Hence St. Augustine 15. de Trinitate, cap. 7. says: Where there is no love (namely, gratuitous), who says that there is any Wisdom? And Bernard serm. 85. in Cant. Nor would I say it is blameworthy, if anyone should define wisdom as the savor of the good. Hence Isidore, lib. 10. Ethymol.: The wise man is so called from savor; for as taste is apt for the discernment of the savor of foods, so the wise man is apt for discerning the savors of things and of causes.
HVIUS actus est contemplari Deum, non quocumque modo, sed ex dilectione cum quadam experimentali suavitate, et affectu. Hinc D. August 15. de Trinitate, cap. 7. ait. Ubi nulla est dilectio, (scilicet gratuita) quis ullam dicit esse Sapientiam? Et Bernardus serm. 85. in Cant. Nec dixerim reprehendendum, si quis sapientiam saporem boni definierit. Unde Isidorus, lib. 10. Ethymol. Sapiens dictus est a sapore: Quia sicut gustus aptus est ad discretionem saporis ciborum, sic sapiens ad dignoscendum sapores rerum, atque causarum est aptus.
From these you have that the Gift of Wisdom is a supernatural habit, infused into the soul by the Holy Spirit, for knowing God and loving him with relish. It is thus defined: It is a habit, infused by God, rendering the soul easily mobile toward loving and tasting the Gifts out of love, or Charity. Therefore its act is to contemplate God, not in any manner whatever, but from love, with a certain experimental sweetness and affection.
Ex his habes, Donum Sapientiae esse habitum supernaturalem, animae a Spiritu Sancto infusum, ad Deum cognoscendum, et saporose diligendum. Sic autem definitur: Est habitus, a Deo infusus, reddens animam facile mobilem ad Dona amanda, et degustanda ex dilectione, seu Charitate. Itaque actus eius est contemplari Deum, non quocumque modo, sed ex dilectione, cum quadam experimentali suavitate, et affectu.
The principal OBJECT, therefore, of Wisdom is God, not under the aspect of the true absolutely; but under the aspect of the true in relation to the aspect of the good, as it is excitatory of the will toward its sapid delectation. Hence Wisdom is called, as it were, sapid knowledge, as the Holy Doctor often says. The quasi-subject of Wisdom is indeed the intellect, but one overflowing its operations into the will, as the sun in the fourth heaven influences the other orbs, and the elements. Therefore the Holy Doctor proves that it does not stop in the intellect lib. de septem donis, De Dono sapientiae, cap. 1. et in Diaeta, tit. 6. cap. 4. et in 1. quaest. 3. Prooem. from Scripture, and the Fathers.
OBIECTUM igitur Sapientiae principale est Deus, non sub ratione veri absolute; sed sub ratione veri in relatione ad rationem boni, ut est excitativum voluntatis ad eius saporosam delectationem. Ideo dicitur Sapientia, quasi sapida scientia, ut saepe ait S. Doct. Sapientiae quasi subiectum est intellectus quidem, sed redundans operationes ad voluntates, sicut Sol in quarto caelo influit in alios orbes, et in elementa. Probat igitur S. Doct. eam non sistere in intellectu lib. de septem donis, De Dono sapientiae, cap. 1. et in Diaeta, tit. 6. cap. 4. et in 1. quaest. 3. Prooem. e Scriptura, et Patribus.
FIRST indeed Eccles. 6. says: For wisdom is according to its name [the doctrine of it], that is, sapid knowledge.
PRIMO quidem Eccles. 6. dicitur: Sapientia enim Doctrinae est secundum nomen eius, idest, sapida scientia.
St. Thomas answers quaest. 45. art. 2. ad 2. Tanner disp. 2. quaest. 4. dub. 3. num. 44. et alii, that this does not seem to be the true interpretation of the name wisdom, namely, that it is Wisdom, as it were sapid knowledge.
RESPONDET D. Thom. quaest. 45. art. 2. ad 2. Tanner. disp. 2. quaest. 4. dub. 3. num. 44. et alii, hanc non videri veram sapientiae nominis interpretationem, quod scilicet sit Sapientia, quasi sapida scientia.
AGAINST this, because thus the Holy Fathers, cited by the Holy Doctor, interpret it. St. Bernard, sermone 85. in Cant. Nor would I say it is blameworthy, if anyone should define wisdom as the good. Isidore, lib. 10. Ethymol., word Sapiens: The wise man is so called from Savor; for as taste is apt for the discernment of the savor of foods, so the wise man is apt for discerning the savors of things and of causes, as I had noted just above.
CONTRA quia sic interpretantur SS. PP. relati a S. Doct. D. Bernardus, sermone 85. in Cant. Nec dixerim reprehendendum, si quis sapientiam boni definierit. Isidorus, lib. 10. Ethymol. verb. Sapiens. Sapiens dictus est a Sapore; quia sicut gustus aptus est ad discretionem saporis ciborum, sic sapiens ad dignoscendos sapores rerum, atque causarum aptus est, ut modo supra notaveram.
He CONFIRMS it from cap. 24. where Wisdom says: My spirit is sweeter than honey.
CONFIRMAT ex cap. 24. Ubi Sapientia ait: Spiritus meus super mel dulcis.
St. Thomas answers that this is had in the Latin, not in the Greek; but the sense is, that Wisdom is according to its name, that is, Great, nor is it less than its name, that is, Fame. But in the Greek it is read, according to its name, τὸ ὄνομα.
RESPONDET S. Thom. id in Latino haberi, non in Graeco; sed sensum esse, Sapientiam esse secundum nomen, idest Magnam, nec minorem suo nomine, idest Fama. Sed in Graeco habetur secundum nomen τὸ ὄνομα.
THEN I say that it cannot be without charity. It is proved by the Holy Doctor ad id Sap. 1. Into a malevolent soul Wisdom shall not enter.
DEINDE dico, eam non posse esse sine charitate. Probatur a S. Doct. ad id Sap. 1. In malevolam animam non introibit Sapientia.
It is PROVED by the Holy Doctors, because it makes rightness of judgment: toward itself and of savor concerning divine things, according to the divine rules to which it is connatural, which indeed are through Charity.
PROBATUR a SS. DD. quia facit rectitudinem iudicii: ad se et saporis circa divina, secundum regulas divinas sibi connaturales, quae quidem sunt per Charitatem.