Doubt — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Doubt II: On prodigality
It is defined by D. Bonavent. in the opusc. Declaratorio terminorum Theologiae: Prodigality is superfluity, which gives what ought not to be given. Hence it recedes to the other extreme from the mean of Liberality, and is less opposed to it than avarice; for Liberality draws nearer to him who gives too much than to him who gives nothing, or less than is fitting. Second, because the prodigal helps others; but the avaricious man is harmful to all. Third, because prodigality is more easily cured.
De PRODIGALITATE.
Definitur a D. Bonavent. in opusc. Declaratorio terminorum Theologiae: Prodigalitas est superfluitas, quae non danda dat. Itaque recedit ad alterum exitremum a medio Liberalitatis, et minus adversatur ei, quam avaritia; nam Liberalitas dat, cui magis accedit, dans nimis, quam dans nihil, vel minus, quam decet. Secundo, quia prodigus alios iuvat; sed avarus est omnibus noxius. Tertio, quia prodigalitas facilius curatur.
It is only a venial sin in its genus. Thus D. Thom. art. 3. But it can be mortal, if he consumes his resources to the ruin of his children, of the needy, of creditors, and of all those to whom he is bound to bring aid, as Tannerus noted disp. 6. quaest. 2. dub. 2. num. 46.
Est autem solum peccatum veniale ex genere suo. Ita D. Thom. art. 3. potest vero esse mortale, si facultates consumat in perniciem filiorum, egenorum; creditorum, et eorum omnium, quibus tenetur subsidium afferre, ut notavit Tannerus disp. 6. quaest. 2. dub. 2. num. 46.
The detriments of Prodigality St. Doctor sets forth admirably on Luke 15, on the parable of the prodigal son.
Prodigalitatis detrimenta recenset S. Doctor egregie ad 15. Lucae ad parabolam filii prodigi.