Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question VI: On superstitious observances for works
S U P E R S T I T I O N of vain observance differs from divinations, because divination is ordered to obtaining an undue knowledge of hidden things; but superstitious observance to obtaining certain advantages, or to harming others. It is done by an explicit or implicit invocation of the Demon.
De superstitiosis observationibus ad opera.
S V P E R S T I T I O vanae observationis a divinationibus differt, quia divinatio ordinatur ad cognitionem occultorum indebitam obtinendam; observatio autem superstitiosa ad obtinendas aliquas commoditates, vel ad nocendum aliis. Fit autem explicita, vel implicita Daemonis invocatione.
And indeed, if the pretended effect surpasses natural power, it is superstition, because honor due to God alone is shown to the devil; but if it does not surpass it, it seems a sin against charity toward oneself, as Valencia says quaest. 13. tertio puncto.
Et quidem, si effectus praetensus naturalem virtutem superet, est superstitio, quia diabolo honor, Deo soli debitus, exhibetur; si vero non superet, videtur peccatum contra charitatem, erga seipsum, ut ait Valentia quaest. 13. puncto tertio.
Moreover the means are known to be superstitious because they are inept, such as Astronomical images, Amulets, characters on tablets, inept words mixed with sacred things, which little women frequently mutter ought to be drunk down. Such are the cures of Ensalmators by certain words. So Fagundez in primum praeceptum Decal. lib. 1. cap. 36. et in secundo Ecclesiae, lib. 8. cap. 4. num. 16. for although by a gift freely given some may have the power of healing from some infirmity, nevertheless the force does not reside in the words, but in the persons. So the Kings of France by divinely favored contact of the right hand cure swollen swellings in the Throat, as Less. notes lib. 2. cap. 43. d. 10. Tanner. d. 5. quaest. 7. d. 2. n. 40.
Media autem ideo cognoscuntur superstitiosa, quia inepta, ut imagines Astronomicae, Amuleti, characteres in laminis, verba inepta, mixta sacris, quae frequenter mulierculae mussitant ebibi debere. Tales sunt curationes Ensalmorum per verba quaedam. Ita Fagundez in primum praeceptum Decal. lib. 1. cap. 36. et in secundo Ecclesiae, lib. 8. cap. 4. num. 16. etsi enim dono gratis dato aliqui habeant virtutem curandi ab infirmitate aliqua, tamen illis vis non inest verbis, sed personis. Ita Reges Franciae divinitus contactu factatae dexterae curant turgidas inflationes in Gula, ut notant Less. lib. 2. cap. 43. d. 10. Tanner. d. 5. quaest. 7. d. 2. n. 40.
Ensalmators indeed would be tolerable if they added permitted prayers to natural remedies, for prayers add nothing evil. So Suarez Tom. 1. de Relig. lib. 2. de superstit. cap. 15. Sanchez. lib. 1. Decal. lib. 2. cap. 50. num. 39. Fagundez in primum Decal. lib. 1. cap 36. and others cited by them.
Ensalmatores quidem tolerandi essent, si remediis naturalibus orationes admissas adderent, nil enim pravi orationes addunt. Ita Suarez Tom. 1. de Relig. lib. 2. de superstit. cap. 15. Sanchez. lib. 1. Decal. lib. 2. cap. 50. num. 39. Fagundez in primum Decal. lib. 1. cap 36. et alii apud eos.
Tannerus adds d. 5. quaest. 7. dub. 2. num. 37. that these Salvators, or Ensalmators, seem to some to have a grace freely given; this however is uncertain, since otherwise these men are reprobate.
Addit Tannerus d. 5. quaest. 7. dub. 2. num. 37. hos Saluatotes, seu Ensalmatores aliquos videri habere gratiam gratis datam; hoc tamen incertum est, cum alias hi viri perditi sint.
But concerning the Psylli of Africa, and the Marsi of Italy, who drew out poisons by drinking them, Delrius ascribes it to diabolical magic lib. 1. disquis. mag. cap. 3. quaest. 4.
De Psyllis vero Africae, et Italiae Marsis, qui haustu venena extrahebant, diabolicae magiae adscribit Delrius lib. 1. disquis. mag. cap. 3. quaest. 4.
Tannerus however warns that not all ceremonies are to be condemned outright, for instance leading beasts of burden around near the temple of some Saint, e.g. St. Pancras; or applying to the sick bread or fat pressed to the Crucifix on Good Friday, on which Greiferus de cruce, lib. 2. cap. 62. See other things in Tannerus and Fagundez.
Monet vero Tannetus, non omnes ceremonias illico damnandas, puta circumducere iumenta prope templum alicuius Sancti v. g. S. Pancratii; panem, adipemve in Parasceve Crucifixo admota, aegris applicare, de quibus Greiferus de cruce, lib. 2. cap. 62. Vide alia in Tannero, et Fagundez.
Indications are commonly brought forward here when things are superstitious; but I have reported these above.
Afferri solent hic indicia, quando sunt res superstitiosae; sed haec supra retuli.
One thing however is wont to be noted as especially important, that one not easily believe apparitions: for the Demon is wont to transform himself into an Angel of light, and to feign himself to be the soul of someone believed saved, so that he may defame it; or another soul, thought to be damned, that he may expose it to veneration, as D. Thom. notes p. p. quaest. 113. art. 4. and others:
Unum autem solet adverti praecipuum, ne apparitionibus facile credatur: Solet enim Daemon in Angelum lucis transformari, atque animam, quae salva creditur alicuius, se fingere, ut eam infamet; vel aliam, quae perdita putatur, venerationi exponat, ut notat D. Thom. p. p. quaest. 113. art. 4. et alii:
Note also that Demons cannot at will bring it about that souls come forth either from Purgatory or from Hell: for they are in the prison of God. Whence that Rich Man in Luke 16. could not come forth from the nether world, as D. Bonavent. notes there, and with him Fagundez n. 9. But that they sometimes go forth from their receptacles with God willing, I shall show in the Third part, Tom. 1. d. 39. with D. Bonavent. in 4. d. 45.
Adverte etiam, non posse Daemones ad libitum efficere, ut animae vel e Purgatorio, vel Inferno prodeant: Sunt enim in Dei carcere. Unde ille Dives Lucae 16. non potuit ex orco evenire, ut notat D. Bonavent. ibi, et cum eo Fagundez n. 9. Exire autem eos aliquando Deo volente e suis receptaculis, ostendam Tertia parte, Tom. 1. d. 39. cum D. Bonavent. in 4. d. 45.
One must nevertheless beware of fallacies. There will be two principal signs for knowing them. First, if they fear the sign of the Cross, or the name of Jesus, of the Virgin Mary, and of the Saints, or flee, or shrink from the relics of Saints, or blessed wax, or holy water. Second, if importunately they seek once and again, mixing in inept things. So Thyraeus lib. de spirituum apparitionibus, cap. 16. Delrius lib. 2. disquis. quaest. 26. sect. 3. Fagundez num. 12.
Cavendum tamen a fallaciis. Erit autem duplex signum praecipuum ad eas noscendas. Primum, si ad Crucis signum, vel nomen Iesu, Mariae Virginis, et Sanctorum timeant, aufugiant, vel reliquias Sanctorum, aut ceram benedictam, aquamve lustralem horreant. Secundum, si importune exquirant semel et iterum immiscendo inepta. Ita Thyraeus lib. de spirituum apparitionibus, cap. 16. Delrius lib. 2. disquis. quaest. 26. sect. 3. Fagundez num. 12.
Against this, that souls appear by the aid of the Demon, they object that Samuel appeared to Saul at the command of the Witch 1. Reg. 28. as I shall say with D. August. 3. part. loc. cit. and many Fathers teach: Iustinus in Dialogo cum Tryph. ad calcem, Lyra, and Caietanus ad primum Reg. 28. Tostatus quaest. 18. D. Thom. 2. 2. quaest. 174. art. 5. et p. p. quaest. 89. art. 6. and many expositors cited by Fagundez num. 18. Suarez Tom. 1. de Relig. lib. 2. de superstit. cap. 16. Pererius in cap. 7. Exodi, 18. Cornelius a lapide in Eccles. p. 3. cap. 46. who favor this opinion. Nor was it done at the command of the Pythoness, but before her incantations, at the command of God.
Quod tamen ope Daemonis animae appareant, opponunt, Samuelem iussu Magae apparuisse Sauli 1. Reg. 28. ut dicam cum D. August. 3. part. loc. cit. et docent multi Patres : Iustinus in Dialogo cum Tryph. ad calcem, Lyra, et Caietanus ad primum Reg. 28. Tostatus quaest. 18. D. Thom. 2. 2. quaest. 174. art. 5. et p. p. quaest. 89. art. 6. et multi expositores apud Fagundez num. 18. Suarez Tom. 1. de Relig. lib. 2. de superstit. cap. 16. Pererius in cap. 7. Exodi, 18. Cornelius a lapide in Eccles. p. 3. cap. 46. qui huic sententiae arridet. Neque id factum est iussu Pythonissae, sed ante eius incantationes, iussu Dei.
Fagundez cap. 37. further warns that there are other superstitions in sacred things, as in the Masses of St. Amator; and the Masses of the Counts, where superstitious things are mixed in. From money first offered to the Crucifix on Good Friday they make a ring for health, which however is not entirely condemned: They gather herbs on the day of St. John the Baptist; which is no hindrance, if they attend to a natural cause. Images of some saint are tied and submerged in a river, until it rains. See him.
Admonet insuper Fagundez cap. 37. alias esse superstitiones in rebus sacris, ut in Missis S. Amatoris; et Missis Comitis, ubi superstitiosa miscentur. E pecunia primo oblata Crucifixo in Parasceve, annulum ad sanitatem efficiunt, quod tamen non omnino damnatur: Colligunt herbas die S. Ioannis Baptistae; quod nil obest, si naturalem causam attendant. Imagines alicuius sancti ligantur submerse in flumine, donec pluat. Vide ipsum.