Disputation — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Disputation XXVIII: On the Judge
This Disputation is entangled with various difficulties; for the ingenuity of men, resourceful in their own defense, has devised various ways by which justice, if it does not favor them, may at least not harm them. The chief interpreter and minister of this is the Judge; of whose judgments the justice and injustice the Angelic Doctor treats, in quaestione 67 and the following. There are also other persons intervening in judgments, as the Accuser, the Defendant, the Witness, and the Advocate, each of whom requires a separate disputation; briefly, however, I shall dispatch myself with these, since not long ago our Father Elizeus ab Oriano wrote most eruditively an entire treatise on this matter ex professo, to whom I refer students of criminal causes and forensic practice as most worthily to be read.
De IUDICE.
DISPUTATIO haec variis involuta est difficultatibus hominum etenim solertia, in propriam defensionem ingeniosa, varios excogitavit modos, quibus iustitia si non faveat, saltem non noceat. Huius praecipuus interpres, et minister est Iudex, de cuius Iudiciorum Iustitia, et iniustitia agit Doctor Angelicus quaestione 67. et sequentibus. Sunt et aliae personae ad iudicia intervenientes, ut Accusator, Reus, Testis, et Advocatus, quorum quisque singularem disputationem exigit; succincte tamen ab his me expediam, cum ex professo eruditissime integrum tractatum hac de re non ita pridem scripserit P. Elizaeus noster ab Oriano, quem rerum criminalium, et praxis forensis studiosis apprime legendum remitto.
Within this disputation
- Question I: Whether power is necessary in a judge
- Question II: Whether a judge ought to follow the truth, and therefore be wise
- Question III: Whether the acts of a judge who has not a true but only a putative title are valid, so that not even he sins
- Question IV: Whether the Pope can subject himself to someone's judgment
- Question V: Whether goodness is necessary in a judge
- Question VI: On the external purity of the hands of the judge
- Question VII: Whether excommunicated judges sin in judging, and judge invalidly