Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question II: On the malice of mockery
MOCKERY (irrisio) is a vice of the tongue, which tends to the neighbor's blushing, and consequently deprives the neighbor of peace and serenity of conscience. Thus St. Thomas, art. 1.; Cajetan, and commonly the Thomists, and other interpreters: St. Bonaventure, l. 3. Pharetrae cap. 3. §. de derisione, where he adduces the charming saying of St. Gregory, l. 25. Moral. cap. 8.: It must be feared, lest when we ourselves fall, he rise again whom we mocked while we stood, though he now knows not how to stand who knew how to mock one standing. Where he seems to indicate that to mock gravely is a mortal sin.
IRRISIO est vitium linguae, quod tendit ad proximi erubescentiam, et per consequens proximum pace, ac serenitate conscientiae priuat. Ita D. Thom. art. 1. Caiet. et communiter Thomistae, aliique interpretes: D. Bonauentura l. 3. Pharetrae cap. 3. §. de derisione, ubi lepidam D. Gregorii l. 25. Moral. cap. 8. sententiam affert: Timendum est, ne etiam nobis cadentibus surgat, qui a nobis stantibus irridetur, quamuis stare iam non nouerit, qui non stantem nouerit irridere. Ubi videtur indicare, esse peccatum mortale grauiter deridere.
He PROVES it in the Bible of the Poor, cap. 70., from punishments. For thus Judges 8.: the men of Sochoth mocked Gedeon, and were condemned to a hard death. Michol, 2 Kings 6., because she mocked David, was made barren by God. The children who mocked Eliseus, 4 Kings 2., were by God's command torn by bears.
ID probat in Bibliis pauperum cap. 70. ex punitionibus. Sic enim Iudic. 8. Viri Sochot deridebant Gedeonem, et dura morte damnati sunt. Michol 2. Reg. 6. quia derisit Dauidem sterilis a Deo facta est. Pueri, qui deriserunt Eliseum 4. Reg. 2. iussu Dei fuerunt Ursis lacerati.
But the holy Doctor ADMONSISHES in the Speculum animae, cap. 1. §. second branch of pride, and cap. 4. §. ex contemptu proximi that mockeries, ironies, and scoffings mostly arise from pride and contempt, and are mortal against charity; but with contempt excluded, it will not be mortal, because mockery is opposed to defects in the manner of light ones, so that it suffuses [the victim] with blushing. Thus also St. Thomas, art. 2., where Cajetan, Soto, l. 5. quaest. 11. art. 1.; Filliucius, Tract. 40. cap. 5. num. 143.; Valencia, quaest. 18. p. 2.; Sayrus, l. 12. cap. 5.; Fagundez, l. 8. cap. 12. num. 11.; Tanner, disp. 4. quaest. 8. num 159.
ADMONET autem S. Doctor in speculo animae, cap. 1. §. secundus ramus superbiae, et cap. 4. §. ex contemptu proximi derisiones, ironias, et subsannationes plerumque oriri e superbia, et contemptu, esseque mortalia contra charitatem; secluso vero contemptu, non erit mortale, quia irrisio opponir defectus ad modum leuium, ut rubore suffundat. Ita etiam D. Thom. art. 2. ubi Caietanus, Sotus l. 5. quaest. 11. art. 1. Filliuc. Tract. 40. cap. 5. num. 143. Valentia quaest. 18. p. 2. Sayrus l. 12. cap. 5. Fagundez l. 8. cap. 12. num. 11. Tanner. disp. 4. quaest. 8. num 159.
IF, however, you judge that he will be most gravely moved, it will be mortal, thus Soto, loc. cit. art. 2. concl. 2.; Filliucius, loc. cit.; St. Thomas with Cajetan and the others above.
SI tamen putes, grauissime commouendum, erit mortale, ita Sotus loc. cit. art. 2. concl. 2. Filliuc. loc. cit. D. Thom. cum Caietano, et alii supra.
LIKEWISE, if someone should mark out a fool by irony or mockery, then he would sin more gravely than if he hurled an insult. The reason is, because it adds contempt, as St. Thomas argues.
ITIDEM, Si quis ironia, vel irrisione stultum notaret, tunc grauius peccaret, quam si contumeliam ferio iaceret. Ratio est, quia addit contemptum, ut arguit D. Thomas.
But St. Bonaventure WARNS, cap. 1. of the Speculum, loc. cit., that subsannatio is by gesture, but irrisio by voice. Thus also Tanner with St. Thomas, quaest. 75. art. 1.
MONET autem D. Bonau. cap. 1. speculi, loc. cit. subsannationem esse gestu; irrisionem autem voce. Ita etiam Tannerus cum D. Thom. quaest. 75. art. 1.
But the mocking of Parents is a grave sin, whence Genesis 7.[9:25]: Chanaan was cursed, as St. Thomas, Cajetan, and Soto note. Therefore Proverbs 30.: The eye that mocks a father, and despises the bearing of his mother, let the ravens of the torrents pick it out, and the sons of the eagle eat it.
GRAVE autem peccatum est Parentum irrisio, unde Genes. 7. maledictus est Chanaan, ut notant D. Thom. Caietanus, et Sotus. Ideo Prouerb. 30. Oculum qui subsannat Patrem, et despicit partum matris suae, effodiant Corui de torrentibus, et comedant eum filii Aquilae.
Tanner, in 4., and Valencia ADD that sometimes it is not a sin, if done for correction, or for suitable recreation, but they enjoin diligent caution.
ADDUNT Tanner. in 4. et Valentia, aliquando non esse peccatum, si fiat ad correptionem, vel ob recreationem conuenientem, sed diligentem cautionem iniungunt.