Subquestion — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Sole Subquestion: On the office and obligation of the preacher
English · Latin · BothHide topicsShow topics
THE office of preaching is deservedly regarded as the nobler and more arduous, the more that Nature and Grace as it were vie in contributing their gifts to its fulfillment; whence although many daily clamor in the pulpits under the guise of preachers, very few discharge that office as is fitting; because it is rarest of all that nature agrees with grace in all things.
De officio, et obligatione Praedicatoris.
PRAEDICANDI munus eo nobilius, magisque arduum merito reputatur, quo Natura, et Gratia veluti certatim sua ad illud complendum dona conferant; unde licet plures in Cathedris sub specie concionatorum quotidie obstrepant; paucissimi, quantum par est, eo munere funguntur; quia rarissime in uno natura cum gratia per omnia convenit.
ALTHOUGH many conditions on the part of body and soul, as has already been indicated, are required for this noble function, they can nevertheless be reduced to Authority and Sufficiency.
QUAMVIS autem plures conditiones ex parte corporis, et animae, ut iam indicatum est, ad nobilem hanc functionem requirantur; reduci tamen possunt ad Authoritatem, et Sufficientiam.
The reason of Authority is gathered from D. Bonaventure in the place cited, and was proved above disp. 1. quaest. 1. num. 27. and it is evident from Jerem. 23. they ran, but I did not send them, Tim. 3. How shall they preach, unless they be sent, Haebr. 5. Nor does any man take the honor to himself, but he who is called by God, as Aaron was: whence Christ, in whom is the supreme power, says of himself: For I did not come of myself, but he sent me, clearly. Hence Isaias was unwilling to go of himself, but said: Behold me, send me, and the Lord answered go, and you shall say to this people, etc. Behold the authority of one sent.
AUTHORITATIS ratio colligitur a D. Bonav. loco cit. et probata est supra disp. 1. quaest. 1. num. 27. et patet e 23. Hierem. ipsi currebant, cum ego non mitterem eos, Tim. 3. Quomodo praedicabunt, nisi mittantur, Haebr. 5. Nec quisquam sibi sumit honorem, sed qui vocatur a Deo, tanquam Aaron: unde Christus, penes quem est suprema potestas, de se ipso dicit: Neque enim a me ipso veni, sed ille me misit, scilicet Patet unde Isayas noluit a seipso ire, sed ait: Ecce ego, mitte me, Dominus autem respondit vade, et dices populo huic, etc. En authoritas missi.
The SIGNS of a true mission from God are indicated by the Saintly Doctor on cap. 9. of Luke. The first is, if the preacher obtains authority from a Pontiff, and especially from the Supreme Pontiff, who holds the place of Christ on earth. The second is, if he has a true zeal for his own and others' salvation, not seeking his own things, according to that of 1. Cor. 4. For we do not preach ourselves. The third is, if the hearers of the sermon show fruit in their works, as is said of the Apostles, who were sent and interpreted, Ioan. 15. I have placed you, that you may go, and bring forth fruit.
SIGNA verae missionis a Deo, indicantur a S. Doctore ad cap. 9. Lucae. Primum est, si a Pontifice praedicator authoritatem obtineat, et praecipue a Summo, qui Christi gerit vices in terris. Secundum est, si habeat verum propriae, et alienae salutis zelum, non quaerens quae sua sunt, iuxta illud 1. Cor. 4. Non enim nosmetipsos praedicamus. Tertium est, si auditores sermonis fructum in opere exhibeant, sicut dicitur de Apostolis, qui missi interpretantur, Ioan. 15. Posui vos, ut eatis, et fructum afferatis.
HENCE the Seraphic Father St. Francis, in cap. 9. of the rule, which is wholly about Preachers, thus begins: Let the Brothers not preach in the diocese of any Bishop when it has been forbidden them by him. He speaks negatively, has been forbidden, as St. Bonaventure observes, because since the power of preaching does not derive its efficacy from the grant of Jurisdiction, as does the power of receiving confessions, an express declaration of that authority is not required by the rule, but a reasonable presumption suffices, especially if such be the preachers as rest upon the approbation of the institution of the Apostolic See, as the Saintly Doctor says in the same place. Besides this authority of the Pontiff, there is required for religious that they be authorized by their own Prelates; so it was enacted in the said cap. 9. of the rule, where it is thus written after the aforesaid words: And let no brother at all dare to preach to the people unless he has been examined and approved by the General minister of this fraternity, and the office of preaching has been granted to him by him.
HINC Seraphicus P. N. Franciscus regulae capite 9. quod totum est de Praedicatoribus, sic incipit: Fratres non praedicent in Episcopatu alicuius Episcopi, cum ab eo illis fuerit contradictum. Negative autem loquitur fuerit contradictum, ut observat S. Bonav. quia cum potestas praedicandi non habeat suam efficaciam a concessione Iurisdictionis, sicut potestas confessiones excipiendi; non requiritur vi regulae ea authoritatis expressio, sed sufficit rationabilis praesumptio, maxime si tales sint praedicatores, quorum institutio sedis Apostolicae approbatione nititur, ut ait S. Doctor ibidem. Praeter hanc autem Pontificis authoritatem, requiritur pro regularibus, ut a propriis Praelatis authorizentur; ita pro Minoribus statutum est dicto cap. 9. regulae, ubi sic scribitur post praefata verba: Et nullus fratrum populo penitus audeat praedicare, nisi a Generali ministro huius fraternitatis fuerit examinatus, et approbatus, et ab eo praedicationis sibi officium fuerit concessum.
This differs not much from the Decree of the Council of Trent, sess. 5. cap. 2. except that it demands an express license of the Bishop; for it thus runs: Religious of whatever order, unless they have been examined and approved by their superiors as to life, morals, and learning, cannot preach even in the churches of their own orders without their license; with which license they are bound to present themselves personally before the Bishops and ask their blessing before they begin to preach; In churches, however, which are not of their orders, they are bound to have, beyond the license of their superiors, also the license of the Bishop, without which they can by no means preach in those churches not of their orders; and the Bishop is to grant that license gratis: And since custom, which has prevailed for a long time now, is the best interpreter of a decree, one must abide by it in the individual dioceses; for in many places the Most Reverend Bishops are accustomed, out of the affection they bear toward Religious, to delegate their vicissitudes in this matter to those Religious' own Prelates; elsewhere for the principal seasons of the year a personal presentation according to the tenor of the council is required, as when one is to preach in the time of Advent or Lent; since indeed the Council so ordained in favor of the Bishops, they can, as they prudently judge, leave the whole matter committed to the zeal and discretion of the Religious Prelates, as is customary in many places; in other places, however, one must abide by the letter of the Council, as is observed by custom there.
AB his non multum differt Decretum Concilii Trident. sess. 5. cap. 2. praeterquam quod expressam Episcopi licentiam postulet; sic enim habet: Regulares cuiuscumque ordinis, nisi a suis superioribus, de vita, moribus, et scientia examinati, et approbati fuerint, ac de eorum licentia, etiam in Ecclesiis suorum Ordinum praedicare non possint; cum qua licentia personaliter se coram Episcopis praesentare, et ab eis benedictionem petere teneantur, antequam praedicare incipiant; In Ecclesiis vero, quae suorum ordinum non sunt, ultra licentiam suorum superiorum, etiam Episcopi licentiam habere teneantur, sine qua in ipsis Ecclesiis non suorum ordinum, nullo modo praedicare possint; ipsam autem licentiam gratis Episcopi concedant: Cuius decreti cum consuetudo, quae din increbruerit, sit optima interpres, ei in singulis Dioecesibus standum est, solent enim multis in locis Reverendissimi DD. Episcopi pro eo, quem erga Regulares habent, affectu, suas vices ipsorum Praelatis in hoc demandare; alibi pro praecipuis anni temporibus personalis praesentatio iuxta tenorem concilii requiritur, ut quando quis tempore Adventus, vel Quadragesimae praedicaturus est; cum enim in favorem Episcoporum Concilium ita ordinaverit, possunt ipsi, prout prudenter iudicaverint, totam rem zelo, et discretioni Praelatorum regularium commendatam relinquere; ut a multis fieri solitum est; alias vero Concilio ad litteram standum est, ubi id solito observatur.
But where the Bishop's license has once been had, if the Parish Priests object, St. Bonaventure warns on the said cap. 9. that malice should rather be borne than scandal caused; Yet if from ceasing a graver evil is feared, as that the Parish Priest oppose himself in order to sow heresy or cockle himself, then the Episcopal Authority is to be used, that the greater evil may be averted; and even the lesser, which can be a scandal to some, is to be prudently forestalled as far as possible.
UBI vero Episcopi licentia semel habetur, si contradixerint Parochi, monet S. Bonaventura ad dictum cap. 9. malitiae potius cedendum, quam scandalum causandum; Si tamen ex cessatione gravius malum timeatur, ut quod Parochus se opponat, ut ipse haeresim, vel zizania seminet; tunc utendum est Authoritate Episcopali, ut maius malum avertatur; et etiam minus, quod possit esse nonnullorum scandalum, quantum fieri possit, prudenter praecavendum est.
But if any religious preaches without the requisite blessing of the Bishop, or while he himself objects, beyond sinning against his rule, if he be a Minorite he can further be punished by the Bishop himself according to the Constitution of Gregory XV. issued in the Bull Inscrutabili 9. Febr. 1622. the tenor of which is had thus: and finally let the Bishop have the authority of coercing and punishing any exempt persons, both secular and Religious, who in alien churches which are not of their orders without the Bishop's license, or in their own churches, or those of their orders, without asking his blessing, or while he himself objects, have presumed to preach, etc. so also reports Bonagratia V. praedicatores, num. 374.
Quod si quis regularis irrequisita Episcopi benedictione, vel ipso contradicente concionetur, ultra, quod peccat in suam regulam, si sit Minor, potest ulterius puniri ab ipso Episcopo iuxta Constitutionem Gregorii XV. latam in Bulla Inscrutabili 9. Febr. 1622. cuius tenor sic habetur: ac Demum habeat Episcopus authoritatem coercendi, ac puniendi quoscumque exemptos tam saeculares, quam Regulares, qui in alienis Ecclesiis, quae suorum ordinum non sunt, absque Episcopi licentia, in suis Ecclesiis, aut suorum ordinum, non petita illius benedictione, aut ipso contradicente praedicare praesumpserint, etc. ita refert etiam Bonagratia V. praedicatores, num. 374.
As to the Authority of one's own Prelate, which the Friars Minors are bound to have by prior examination before they preach; although the Rule specifies that it is to be given by the general minister alone according to the letter; yet since that was provided so that dangers might be forestalled, the rule is not violated while the license of examining and approving is granted to others; for as Bishops take care that those to be ordained be examined by others, and the presidents of Universities are accustomed to depute others to examine those whom they are going to endow with the insignia of the Doctorate; so the General minister can by others examine and approve those whom he is going to elect to the office of preaching, although the rule has: Unless he has been examined by the general minister of this fraternity. He himself, however, is bound to bestow the authority. So D. Bonaventure loco cit. and if of the sufficiency of him who is to be promoted to the grade of preacher there is no doubt at all, a prior examination is not necessary; but it suffices that the account of his sufficiency be made known to the General, and he himself can send letters as preacher; so the Saintly Doctor cit.
Quantum ad Authoritatem proprii Praelati, quam fratres Minores praevio examine tenentur habere, priusquam praedicent; licet Regula eam iuxta litteram a solo ministro generali dandam specificet; cum tamen id cautum sit, ut periculis obvietur, nihil regulae temeratur, dum aliis examinandi, et approbandi licentia conceditur; uti enim Episcopi ordinandos per alios curant examinari, et Universitatum praesides alios deputare solent ad examinandos eos, quibus Doctoratus infulas sunt donaturi; ita per alios potest Generalis minister examinare, et approbare, quos ad praedicationis officium electurus sit, licet regula habeat: Nisi a ministro generali huius fraternitatis fuerit examinatus. Ipse tamen authoritatem praestare tenetur. Ita D. Bonaventura loco cit. quod si de sufficientia illius, qui ad praedicatoris gradum promovendus est, nullatenus dubitetur; non est praevium examen necessarium; sed sufficit, ut eius sufficientiae ratio Generali innotescat, ipseque litteras concionatorias mittere possit; ita S. Doctor cit.
These things said concerning the granting of Authority may suffice: Truly concerning its removal, or suspension, certain things are to be noted.
Haec de concessione Authoritatis dicta sufficiant: Verum de eius ablatione, seu suspensione quaedam notanda sunt.
First, the Lateran Council under Leo X. suspends those who preach false and uncertain miracles; as also prophecies lightly founded in sacred scripture, or in no way approved by the Apostolic See; unless the Ordinaries of the places, with three or four more learned men deputed for their examination, have permitted it, while they have not had the opportunity of consulting the aforesaid See.
Primo Concilium Lateranense sub Leone X. suspendit praedicantes falsa, et incerta miracula; uti et prophetias, in sacra scriptura leviter fundatas, seu a sede Apostolica nequaquam approbatas; nisi locorum Ordinarii tribus, aut quatuor viris eruditioribus ad earum examen deputatis, id permiserint, dum praefatam sedem consulendi opportunitatem non habuerint.
Second, the Council of Trent sess. 5. cap. 2. de reform. after D. Bonaventure's exposition on the Psalt. upon those words of Psalm. 49. But to the sinner God said: Why do you declare, etc. assigns three cases in which preaching is prohibited, and suspension even of Religious can be inflicted by the Bishop, as legate of the Apostolic See; yet it is not incurred ipso facto.
Secundo Concilium Tridentinum sess. 5. cap. 2. de reform. post D. Bonaventuram exposit. in Psalt. ad ea verba Psalm. 49. Peccatori autem dixit Deus, quare tu enarras, etc. tres casus assignat, in quibus praedicatio prohibetur, et suspensio etiam Regularium ab Episcopo, tanquam sedis Apostolicae legato, potest inferri; non tamen ipso facto incurritur.
The first case is, if erroneous propositions are preached; but what Doctors understand by an erroneous proposition I said in this Tome above, where I treated of heresy.
Primus casus est, si praedicentur propositiones erroneae; quid autem per propositionem erroneam Doctores intelligant, dixi hoc Tomo supra, ubi de haeresi.
The second case is, if scandalous propositions are preached, to which the Saintly Doctor reduces loco cit. the notorious crime of the preacher himself; for this is wont to give birth to no small scandal, for it is shameful if the voice bite the life, and there be indeed the voice of Jacob, but the hands of Esau, as the Saintly Doctor says here ex 27. Genes.
Secundus casus est, si praedicentur propositiones scandalosae, ad quas reducit S. Doctor loco cit. crimen notorium ipsius praedicantis; hoc enim scandalum non modicum solet parturire, turpe enim est, si vox vitam remordeat, et sit vox quidem Iacob, manus autem esau, ut ait hic S. Doctor ex 27. Genes.
The third case is, if the propositions that are preached be heretical.
Tertius casus est, si propositiones, quae praedicantur, sint haereticae.
To these are added the prohibitions made by Alexander VII. 3. Decemb. 1661. in the Bull which begins: Sollicitudo omnium, where various statutes of Paul V. Sixtus IV. and Pius V. concerning the same are renewed, that no one in a sermon to the people or other public acts may defend the opinion of D. Thomas concerning the conception of the Most Blessed Virgin, by not asserting her to be immaculate; others also are prohibited who preach the opinion of D. Thomas to be sinful or heretical, see Bonagratia cit. num. 380.
His accedunt prohibitiones factae ab Alexandro VII. 3. Decemb. 1661. in Bulla, quae incipit: Sollicitudo omnium, ubi renovantur varia circa idem statuta Pauli V. Sixti IV. et Pii V. ut nullus in concione ad populum, aliisve actis publicis, propugnet opinionem D. Thomae de Beatissimae Virginis conceptione, eam immaculatam non asserendo; prohibentur etiam alii quicumque praedicate opinionem D. Thomae peccaminosam, vel haereticam esse, vide Bonagratiam cit. num. 380.
As to the sufficiency required for the office of preacher, the Saintly Doctor places it on the part of the soul in solid learning and a clean conscience, thus he has in the exposition on Psalm. 158. upon those words: let my supplication draw near.
Quantum ad sufficientiam, ad praedicatoris officium requisitam, eam ex parte animae ponit S. Doctor in solida scientia, et munda conscientia, ita habet expositione, in Psalm. 158. ad ea verba: appropinquet deprecatio mea.
That he may acquire a clean conscience, he ought first to attend to his own salvation before the edification of others, in the example of Elias, who first went into the desert, and came to the mount of God in Horeb, where he was taught, as the Saintly Doctor says, ad 2. Lucae; afterward he was sent to anoint Kings and Prophets, 3. Reg. 19. so Christ himself first began to do, then to teach.
Ut mundam acquirat conscientiam, debet propriae saluti prius vacare, quam alienae aedificationi, exemplo Eliae, qui prius abiit in desertum, et pervenit ad montem Dei in Oreb, ubi edoctus est, ut ait S. Doctor, ad 2. Lucae; postea vero missus est ad ungendos Reges, et Prophetas, 3. Reg. 19. sic ipse Christus prius caepit facere, postea docere.
But concerning the acquisition of learning, St. Bonaventure notes ad cap. 8. sup. prope finem that eight things are very useful to a preacher; namely the knowledge of wisdom through investigation: the commemoration, through frequentation: the declaration, through love: the Operation, through fulfillment; the contestation, through disputation, the communication, through conference; the circumduction, through interrogation; finally the assumption, through incorporation. For by investigating we know: by frequenting we commit the ideas of things to memory: by loving, we delight in the things we learn; by operating, we fulfill them; by disputing, we solve difficulties for ourselves and others; by conferring, we communicate to others what we know; by interrogating, we return by discursive circuits to the same point, and convince others more of the truth; finally we assume knowledge as it were incorporated in gesture and voice, and so persuade others of it more easily.
Circa vero scientiae acquisitionem, notat S. Bonaventura ad cap. 8. sup. prope finem, octo praedicatori valde esse utilia; cognitionem scilicet sapientiae per investigationem: commemorationem, per frequentationem: declarationem, per amorem: Operationem, per impletionem; concertationem per disputationem, communicationem, per collationem; circuitiomem, per interrogationem; assumptionem denique, per incorporationem. Investigando quippe cognoscimus: frequentando, memoriae ideas rerum mandamus: amando, quae discimus, de his delactamur; operando, ea implemus; disputando, difficultates nobis, aliisque solvimus; conferendo, aliis, quae novimus, communicamus; interrogando, in id ipsum per discursus circuitum redimus, aliosque de veritate magis convincimus; tandem scientiam gestu, et voce quodammodo incorporatam assumimus, et sic eam aliis facilius suademus.
The sufficiency of the Preacher on the part of the body the Saintly Doctor describes, Apologet. quaest. 4. First, he ought to be of competent age, lest being too much a boy he seem to handle boyish things; which condition is to be held not so much from the series of years as from an honest gravity of countenance and manly composition. Second, he ought to be free of every notable deformity of body and head, for those who are too short, fat, or hunchbacked, are not apt for persuading, but are easily held in contempt; Third, the strength of body is the more necessary for this office, because it is to be carried out strongly and manfully. Fourth, competent eloquence procures a singular grace for preaching, for which many things are necessary on the part of voice and gesture, which are treated of professedly among the Rhetoricians.
Sufficientiam Praedicatoris ex parte corporis describit S. Doctor, Apologet. quaest. 4. Primo enim debet esse aetatis competentis, ne nimis puer puerilia tractare videatur; quae conditio non tam ex annorum serie, quam ex honesta vultus gravitate, et virili compositione habenda est. Secundo debet carere omni notabili corporis, et capitis deformitate, qui enim sunt nimis breves, crassi, vel Gibbosi, ad suadendum non sunt apti, sed facile contemptui habentur; Tertio, vires corporis eo magis sunt ad hoc munus necessariae, quod fortiter, et viriliter est peragendum. Quarto, competens facundia praecipuam praedicationi gratiam conciliat, ad quam sunt plura ex parte vocis, et gestus necessaria, quae apud Rhetores ex professo tractantur.
Whoever recognizes in himself these conditions, both of body and soul, and of learning and conscience, there remains that for the utility of the people he pour forth the Word of God in a threefold manner, that I may speak with D. Bonaventure on those words of Psalm 118. in labiis meis pronunciavi, etc. Namely wisely, eloquently, and confidently: Wisely, that he teach; eloquently, that he please; confidently, that he move: for preaching foolishly, confusedly, and timidly, he neither teaches, nor pleases, nor moves.
Has tam Corporis, et animae, quam scientiae, et conscientiae conditiones quicumque in se recognoscit, restat, ut ad populi utilitatem eructet Dei Verbum tripliciter, ut cum D. Bonaventura loquar in ea verba Psalmi 118. in labiis meis pronunciavi, etc. Scilicet sapienter, eloquenter, et confidenter: Sapienter, ut doceat; eloquenter, ut placeat; confidenter, ut moveat: insipide enim, confuse, et timide praedicans, nec docet, nec placet, nec mouet.
Then the Saintly Doctor admonishes, in cap. 6. Lucae, that the Preacher teach useful things, not subtle ones; that he be also free from ostentation in sign, from ambition in mind; from flattery in word, and from respect of persons in deed.
Deinde Monet S. Doctor, in cap. 6. Lucae, ut Praedicator utilia doceat, non subtilia; ut sit etiam immunis ab ostentatione in signo, ab ambitione in animo; ab adulatione in verbo, et a personarum acceptione in facto.
But on those words of the same cap. 6. And he taught the multitudes, the Seraphic Doctor exhibits the form of Apostolic preaching, while he teaches that a good Preacher ought now to stand, now to sit; now to see, presently to ascend; which are to be taken not only corporally, but with a worthier title spiritually; namely that he stand, intending rightly; at times sit, contemplating quietly; see, discerning well; and ascend, acting perfectly; all which the Saintly Doctor concludes with that of Jerem. 6. Stand upon the ways, behold the rectitude of intention, and see, and ask, which be the good way, behold the solicitude of discretion. And walk in it, that is, in the exercise of action1, and you shall find refreshment for your souls, namely through the repose of contemplation. 1 N. Editor's note: the print/OCR reads 'pet actionis scilicet exercitium'; rendered as 'per actionis' because 'pet' is not Latin and 'per' is required by the parallel 'per otium contemplationis' later in the same quotation.
In ea autem verba ad idem cap. 6. Docebat autem turbas, formam Apostolicae praedicationis exhibet Seraphicus, dum docet, quod bonus Praedicator nunc debeat stare, nunc sedere; modo videre, mox ascendere; quae non solum corporaliter, sed potiori titulo spiritualiter sunt accipienda; ut scilicet stet, recte intendendo; aliquando sedeat, quiete contemplando; videat bene discernendo; et ascendat perfecte agendo; quae omnia concludit S. Doctor illo Ierem. 6. State super vias, ecce rectitudo intentionis, et videte, et interrogate, quae sit via bona, en sollicitudo discretionis. Et ambulate in ea, per actionis scilicet exercitium, et invenietis refrigerium animabus vestris, nempe per otium contemplationis.
¶ Of such a good Preacher the Saintly Doctor weaves much from the Holy Fathers, lib. 1. Phar. cap. 14.
¶ De tali bono Praedicatore multa e Sanctis Patribus contexit S. Doctor, lib. 1. Phar. cap. 14.
¶ GREGORY, lib. 6. Moral. cap. 17. thus describes the true herald of Christ: He is the more in God's love with God who draws very many to the love of him: The Redeemer of the human race showed miracles by day in the cities; and gave himself to the pursuit of prayer by spending the night in vigil; that he might intimate to perfect preachers, namely, that they should not utterly desert the active life out of love of speculation, nor altogether despise the joys of contemplation through excess of operation, but contemplating in quiet should found what, speaking toward their neighbors, they plant.
¶ GREGORIUS, lib. 6. Moral. cap. 17. sic verum Christi praeconem describit: Ille apud Deum magis in amore eius est, qui ad eius amorem plurimos trahit: Humani generis Redemptor per diem miracula in urbibus exhibebat; et ad orationis studium in nocte pernoctabat; ut perfectis videlicet praedicatoribus innuat, quatenus nec activam vitam amore speculationis funditus deserant, nec contemplationis gaudia operationis nimietate penitus contemnant, sed quieti contemplantes sobeant, quod quieti erga proximos loquentes fundant.
¶ JEROME, lib. 1. in Lament. cap. 1. tom. 4. He is the Ecclesiastical Doctor who moves tears, not laughter, who rebukes sinners, who says that no one is blessed, no one is happy.
¶ HIERONYMUS, lib. 1. in Lament. cap. 1. tom. 4. Ille est Doctor Ecclesiasticus, qui lacrymas, non risum movet, qui corripit peccatores, qui nullum beatum, nullum dicit esse felicem.
D. AUGUSTINE de doctrina Christiana, lib. 4. cap. 17. he who strives by speaking to persuade that a thing is good, despises none of these three, namely that he teach, that he delight, and that he bend, but prays and acts, that he be heard intelligently, gladly, obediently.
D. AUGUSTINUS de doctrina Christiana, lib. 4. cap. 17. qui dicendo nititur persuadere, quod bonum est, nihil horum trium spernit, ut scilicet doceat, ut delectet, et flectat, orat, atque agat, ut intelligenter, libenter, obedienter audiatur.
AMBROSE, lib. 2. de Virg. at the beginning tom. 4. He who teaches ought to excel above him who is taught.
AMBROSIUS, lib. 2. de Virg. initio tom. 4. Debet is, qui docet, supra eum, qui docetur excellere.
ISIDORE de summo bono, lib. 3. cap. 36. sent. 5. The just preacher ought first to act well, that consequently he may be able to teach well.
ISIDORUS de summo bono, lib. 3. cap. 36. sent. 5. Prius debet iustus praedicator bene agere, ut consequenter possit bene docere.
¶ BERNARD super Cantica, serm. 16. The threefold cord, which is not easily broken, for drawing souls out of the prison of the devil and drawing them after you to the Celestial Kingdoms: if you judge rightly, if you utter worthily, and if you confirm by living.
¶ BERNARDUS super Cantica, serm. 16. Funiculus triplex, qui difficile rumpitur ad extrahendas animas de carcere diaboli, et trahendas post se ad Coelestia Regna, si recte sentias, si digne proloquaris, et si vivendo confirmes.
SENECA epist. 52. most excellently draws forth the parts of a true preacher thus: Let us choose not those who pour forth great words with celerity, but those who teach by their life; who when they have said what is to be done, prove this very thing by doing what they teach; and after certain words: Choose as Doctor him whom you admire more when you see him than when you hear him.
SENECA epist. 52. egregie partes veri praedicatoris sic depromit: Eligamus non eos, qui verba magna celeritate praecipitant, sed eos, qui vita docent; qui cum dixerint quid faciendum sit, probant hoc ipsum faciendo quod docent, et post quaedam verba: Eum elige Doctorem, quem magis admireris, cum videris, quam cum audieris.
¶ Nor is it a wonder that Men illustrious in doctrine and sanctity have so exalted this office of preaching as to celebrate it with every praise, and in it to demand most exquisitely whatever is required for the preeminence of human life, namely the sweet symphony of mouth and work: Hence Christ himself, the Apostles themselves, and those saints who are read of as more illustrious in both testaments, were appointed to preach; and truly he is a heavenly man who, announcing heaven to others, expresses it in himself as it were; whence the Seraphic Doctor, on those words of Psal. 17. he bowed the Heavens, and descended, compares Preachers to clouds, because doubtless clinging continually to the heavens, they ought to thunder with threatenings, flash with miracles, and rain down doctrines.
¶ Nec mirum, Viros doctrina, et sanctitate praeclatos eo hoc praedicandi munus evexisse, ut illud omni laude celebrent, et in eo quicquid sit ad vitae humanae praestantiam requisitum, dulcem scilicet symphoniam oris, et operis, exquisitissime postulent: Hinc ipse Christus, ipsi Apostoli, et qui illustriores in utroque testamento leguntur sancti, ad praedicandum sunt deputati; et vere vir coelicus est, qui coelum aliis annuncians, illud in se quodammodo exprimit; unde Seraphicus Doctor, in ea verba Psal. 17. inclinavit Coelos, et descendit, Praedicatores nubibus comparat, quia nimirum coelis iugiter adhaerentes, tonare debent minis, coruscare miraculis, et pluere doctrinis.
On the other hand, since it is most shameful that a Preacher of Christ signify one thing with his mouth and another with his work, D. Bonaventure in the said lib. Pharetra, cap. 15. darts the most acute sentences of the Fathers against such a one, as it were chosen arrows.
E contra autem cum turpissimum sit, Praedicatorem Christi aliud ore, aliud opere significare, D. Bonavent in dicto, lib. Pharetra, cap. 15. acutissimas patrum sententias in talem, tamquam electas vibrat sagittas.
¶ GREGORY super Ezechiel, hom. 18. of such a Preacher writes thus: It is most shameful for us there to fall by neglect, whence by preaching we have tried to raise others up; and super, lib. 4. Reg. ind. 12. cap. 76. what we preach with the tongue we destroy by examples: while with works we teach iniquity, and mere votes we put forward as things that are just. We wear away our bones with fastings, and swell in mind: we cover the body with despised garments, and surpass purple in elation of heart; we lie in ashes, and receive lofty things, Doctors of humility, leaders of pride.
¶ GREGORIUS super Ezechiel, hom. 18. de tali Praedicatore sic scribit: Turpe est nimis ibi nos negligendo cadere, unde praedicando conati sumus alios levare, et super, lib. 4. Reg. ind. 12. cap. 76. quod per linguam praedicamus, per exempla destruimus: dum iniqua docemus operibus, et sola vota, ea quae sunt iusta praetendimus. Ossa ieiuniis atterimus, et mente turgemus: corpus despectis vestibus tegimus, et elatione cordis Purpuram superamus; iacemus in cinere, et excelsa suscipimus, Doctores humilitatis, duces superbiae.
JEROME epistola 2. ad Nepot. Delicate is the master who with full belly disputes about fastings: A robber too can accuse avarice; the mouth of the Priest of Christ let it accord with his mind.
HIERONYMUS epistola 2. ad Nepot. Delicatus est magister, qui pleno ventre de ieiuniis disputat: Accusare avaritiam potest et latro; Sacerdotis Christi os cum mente concordet.
ISIDORE lib. 2. de summo bono, cap. 2. sent. 10. To the heaping up of a greater guilt it pertains that anyone know what he ought to follow, and be unwilling to follow what he knows; and lib. 3. cap. 37. sent. 1. he who does not live as he teaches makes the truth itself which he preaches contemptible.
ISIDORUS lib. 2. de summo bono, cap. 2. sent. 10. Ad maioris culpae cumulum pertinet scire quemquam, quod sequi oporteat, et sequi nolle, quod sciat, et lib. 3. cap. 37. sent. 1. qui non vivit, sicut docet, ipsum, quam praedicat veritatem, Contemtibilem facit.
CHRYSOSTOM de compunctione cordis, lib. 1. at the end: To teach and not to do confers not only no gain, but very great loss; For great is the condemnation of him who composes indeed his sermon; but negligently neglects his life and his work.
CHRYSOSTOMUS de compunctione cordis, lib. 1. in fine: Docere, et non facere non solum nihil lucri, sed etiam damni plurimum confert; Grandis enim condemnatio est componenti quidem sermonem suum; vitam vero suam, atque operam negligenti.
AUGUSTINE as cited by the Seraphic Doctor, there, more strongly inveighs against Preachers of this sort. Hear yourself, O hardest, most savage, most deaf Doctor; what good to me a tongue of gold and a heart of iron.
AUGUSTINUS apud Seraphicum, ibi, fortius in huiusmodi Praedicatores invehitur. Exaudi te ipsum durissime, immanissime, surdissime Doctor; quid mihi lingua aurea, et cor ferreum.
BERNARD serm. de convers. ad clericos, cap. 31. on those words: Blessed are the peacemakers, thus speaks: Consider diligently, not the peaceable, but the peacemakers are commended; for there are those who say and do not: surely as the hearers of the law are not just, but the doers; so not the announcers of peace, but the makers are called blessed.
BERNARDUS serm. de convers. ad clericos, cap. 31. in ea verba: Beati pacifici, sic proloquitur: Considerate diligenter, non pacificos, sed pacificos commendari, sunt enim qui dicunt, et non faciunt: sane quemadmodum non auditores legis iusti sunt, sed factores; sic non annunciatores pacis, sed actores beatificantur.
SENECA finally in an epistle thus concludes, as cited by the Saintly Doctor: this is most shameful, what is wont to be objected to us, that we speak words, not handle works.
SENECA tandem in epist. sic apud S. Doctorem concludit: hoc turpissimum est, quod nobis obiici solet, verba nos fari, non opera tractari.
These things the Saintly Doctor, in the said cap. 16. described from the writings of the Fathers; in the following chapter, however, he brings forth excellent sentences from the same Fathers against those usurping Preaching; which fit almost within what has been said: see it itself.
Haec S. Doctor, dicto, cap. 16. e patrum scriptis descripsit, cap. vero sequenti eximias profert sententias ex iisdem patribus contra usurpantes Praedicationem; quae in iam dicta fere quadrant: ipsum vide.
¶ AS to the manner and matter of what is preachable, St. Francis briefly designates it, in the said cap. 9. of the Rule, admonishing in these words, that in the preaching they make, their words be chaste and examined for the utility and edification of the people, announcing to them vices and virtues, punishment and glory with brevity of speech.
¶ QUANTUM ad modum, et materiam praedicabilem, eam breviter designat S. P. Franciscus, dicto, cap. 9. Regule, monendo his verbis, ut in praedicatione, quam faciunt, sint casta, et examinata eorum eloquia ad utilitatem, et aedificationem populi, annunciando eis vitia, et virtutes, poenam, et gloriam cum brevitate sermonis.
¶ To which the Council of Trent sounds in accord, in the place cited above; exhorting the heralds of the divine word with like words: Faithful preachers according to their capacity shall feed with salutary words, saying what it is necessary for all to know for salvation, announcing to them with brevity and easiness of speech, the vices which they ought to shun, and the virtues which they ought to pursue, that they may be able to escape eternal punishment and attain heavenly glory. Finally as to the reprehension, whether special or general, which each one is bound to employ in preaching, that he may more efficaciously compel sinners to repentance; the Saintly Doctor explains it pre-eminently in Apologet. cap. 2. which chapter Bonagratia transcribed almost word for word, Verb. Praedicator, cited above, indicating that therein is exhibited an excellent doctrine for preachers.
¶ QUIBUS consonar Concilium Tridentinum, loco supra citato; hortando divini verbi praecones similibus verbis: Praedicatores fideles pro sua capacitate pascent salutaribus verbis dicendo, quae scire omnibus necessarium est ad salutem, annunciando eis cum brevitate, et facilitate sermonis, vitia, quae eos declinare, et virtutes, quas sectari oportet, ut poenam aeternam evadere, et coelestem gloriam consequi valeant. Quantum denique ad correptionem, seu specialem, seu generalem, quam quisque inter praedicandum adhibere tenetur, ut efficacius peccatores cogat ad resipiscentiam; praeclare eam explicat S. Doctor, in Apologet. cap. 2. quod caput ad verbum fere transcripsit Bonagratia, Verb. Praedicator, supra cit. indicans, ibi eximiam praedicatoribus doctrinam exhiberi.
SINCE therefore the Saintly Doctor shrewdly established the difference between the Judge and the Preacher, he pursues his office in reproving sinners thus: The Doctor or Preacher, who ought to instruct hearers of diverse kinds, that he may render virtues the more commendable, necessary to salvation, shows the vices opposed to them, how harmful and detestable they are. And in certain kinds of men certain vices are more customary, as among Merchants fraud and lies; among Soldiers rapine and burnings; and so of others; it is necessary that on account of the general instruction, although he accuse the genus of men specially, he admonish them to beware of the vices that lie in wait specially for themselves, as the Physician teaches Patients laboring under diverse infirmities to abstain from the foods more harmful to themselves and from others. For nothing profits the sick, if he were to say: Beware of all harmful foods generally, unless he specified in each affection what was specially harmful to them, or profitable to health. But what is said, that the Preacher ought to accuse all sinning in general, and not descend to species, this is to be understood of the notable specification of persons, not of vices, or states, or offices, which cannot properly be described without the expression of the office or state of those who have been accustomed to offend specially in this. For it can thus congruously be said in general: You Artificers frequently sin in this; and you Soldiers in this; and you Religious in that; you Clerics in that other; and so of the others, if there are many there of each of those kinds to whom he speaks, so that no one, that each one conscious to himself of such a sin may be compunct, and be confounded in himself, and no one be made specially notable of this, whom the evidence of falsehood otherwise does not make notable, or who does not betray himself to be guilty, attributing to himself specially with a murmur what was said generally, according to that of the Poet. Conscius ipse sibi, de se putat omnia dici. For the faithful Doctor ought to intend only correction and edification, not the confusion or defamation of anyone present or absent. Wherever therefore it is presumed that someone is made specially notable of a sin previously unknown to others by the preaching, whence a grievance or scandal can arise, it is better to be silent, and to speak rather other edifying things: But he who is accustomed to do the contrary shows himself contentious, or envious, or imprudent, or greedy of vain glory, who since he would not otherwise be accepted among men, seeks glory for himself from the infamy of others: whom by confounding you exasperate, him you more slowly edify, and wound with the sting of rancor.
POSTQUAM igitur Sanctus Doctor differentiam inter Iudicem, et Praedicatorem scite statueret, huius officium in corripiendis peccatoribus sic prosequitur: Doctor, seu Praedicator, qui diversi generis auditores debet instruere, ut virtutes magis reddat commendabiles, necessarias ad salutem, vitia his opposita, quam sint nociva, et detestabilia ostendit. Et quibusdan generibus hominum quaedam vitia sunt magis usitata, ut Mercatoribus fraus, et mendacia; Militibus rapina, et incendia; et ita de aliis necesse est, quod propter generalem instructionem, quod licet genus hominum specialiter arguat, et moneat sibi specialius insidiantia vitia cavere, sicut Medicus AEgros diversis infirmitatibus laborantes docet a sibi magis noxiis cibis, et aliis abstinere. Nihil enim prodest et infirmis, si diceret: Cavete ab omnibus cibis nocivis generaliter, nisi specificaret in qualibet passione, quid illis specialius noxium esset, aut proficuum sanitati. Quod autem dicitur, quod Praedicator debeat in genere omnes arguere peccantes, et non descendere ad species, hoc est intelligendum de notabili specificatione personarum, non vitiorum, vel statuum, vel officiorum, quae non possunt proprie describi sine expressione officii, vel status illorum, qui in hoc specialiter offendere consueverunt. Potest enim sic congrue generaliter dici: Vos Artifices peccatis frequenter in hoc; et vos Milites in hoc;et vos Religiosi in isto; vos Clerici in illo; et sic de aliis, si sunt ibi plures de quolibet genere illorum, ad quos loquitur, sive nullus, ut quisque sibi conscius talis peccati compungatur, et in se confundatur, et nullus specialiter notabilis de hoc reddatur, quem falsi evidentia alias non facit notabilem, vel qui seipsum non prodit esse reum, sibi adscribendo specialiter cum murmure, quod generaliter dictum constat iuxta illud Poëtae. Conscius ipse sibi, de se putat omnia dici. Correctioni enim, et aedificationi tantum debet intendere Doctor fidelis, non confusioni, vel infamationi alicuius praesentis, vel absentis. Ubicunque ergo praesumitur, quod aliquis specialiter de peccato prius incognito aliis ex praedicatione reddatur notabilis, unde potest oriri gravamen, vel scandalum, melius est tacere, et alia aedificatoria magis loqui: Qui vero facere consuevit contrarium, aut contentiosum, aut invidum, aut imprudentem se demonstrat, aut vanae gloriae cupidum, qui cum aliunde non esset acceptus apud homines, ex aliorum infamia gloriam sibi quaerit: quem confundendo exasperas, hunc tardius aedificas, et rancoris aculeo vulneras.