Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question II: On the state of perfection
The state of perfection can be considered in three ways, with the Saintly Doctor here, in the sermon cited, namely according to profession, conversation, and contemplation; the Perfection of profession shines forth especially in Regulars, not in the fact, so to speak, but in the becoming; since they are bound to labor for its acquisition: the Perfection of conversation shines forth especially in Bishops, whose it is to behave well in the house of God, as D. Paul writes to Timothy, who was a Bishop, 1. Tim. 3. that you may know how you ought to behave in the house of God; and since this conversation is of immense burden, and honor; hence it is that Bishops are supposed to be in the state of perfection, as I shall say below. Finally Contemplation has its place in those leading a solitary life; whether this be cenobitic, or eremitic; for below, where I treat of the active, and contemplative life, I shall show that both can serve contemplation.
STATUS perfectionis tripliciter potest considerari, a S. Doctore hic, serm. cit. nempe secundum professionem, conversationem, et contemplationem; Perfectio professionis praecipue elucet in Regularibus, non in facto, ut ita dicam, sed in fieri; cum pro eius acquisitione laborare teneantur: Perfectio conversationis maxime in Episcopis emicat, quorum est in domo Dei bene conversari, ut ad Timotheum, qui erat Episcopus, scribit D. Paulus 1. Tim. 3. ut scias, quomodo oporteat te in domo Dei conversari, et cum haec conversatio ingentis sit et oneris, et honoris; hinc est quod Episcopi in statu perfectionis, ut dicam infra, esse supponuntur. Contemplatio denique locum habet in degentibus solitariam vitam; sive haec sit coenobitica, sive eremitica; infra enim, ubi de vita activa, et contemplativa, ostendam, utramque posse contemplationi deservire.
But the Saintly Doctor teaches that these states of perfection consist in their own governance, and the exclusion of sin; whence he says that they are signified by those three Kings, of whom Eccl. 49. says that they alone sinned not: besides David, Ezechias, and Josias, all the kings committed sin. In David, who is interpreted desirable in countenance, the perfection of contemplation is shown: in Ezechia, which name signifies the help of the Lord, perfect conversation is indicated, which needs to lean on divine help: in Josias, however, who is interpreted, in whom is sacrifice, perfect profession is designated, sacrificing itself in Religion: But since various grades, and modes of perfection, which are exercised in this life, can be numbered with these, I shall discuss this material more aptly in several doubts.
Hos autem perfectionis status docet S. Doctor stare in sui regimine, et peccati exclusione; unde ait, eos signari tribus illis Regibus, qui Eccl. 49. dicuntur soli non peccasse: praeter David, Ezechiam, et Iosiam, omnes reges commiserunt peccatum. In David, qui interpretatur desiderabilis vultu, monstratur perfectio contemplationis: in Ezechia, quod nomen auxilium Domini significat, indicatur perfecta conversatio, quae divino auxilio niti indiget: in Iosia autem, qui, in quo est sacrificium, interpretatur, perfecta professio, se ipsam in Religione sacrificans, designatur: Verum cum his adnumerari possint varii perfectionis, gradus, et modi; qui pro hac vita exercentur; materiam hanc nonnullis dubitationibus aptius discutiam.