Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question IV: On the vices opposed to magnificence
One vice St. Bonaventure names, locis adductis, which is called Parvificentia, inclining to defect; but the other, rising to excess, is still unnamed among the Latins, as Bl. Thomas also teaches, quaest. 135. art. 1. and 2., from Aristotle, 2. Eth. cap. 7. and lib. 4. cap. 2.
Unvm vitium nominat S. Bonavent. locis adductis, quod dicitur Parvificentia declinans ad defectum; alter vero ad excessum exurgens, adhuc apud Latinos innominatum, ut docet etiam D. Thom. quaest. 135. art. 1. et 2. ex Aristotele 2. Eth. cap. 7. et lib. 4. cap. 2.
For since magnificence is concerned with great works and expenses, it ought to hold the mean, respecting the means of the spender and the dignity of the work. But if it blazes less than the dignity of the work requires, it is called Parvificentia; if, however, it exceeds, it is called Banausia, from the furnace, which consumes all, and it can be called Consumptio, as Bl. Thomas says, art. 2.
Cvm enim magnificentia magnis in operibus, et sumptibus versetur, debet medium tenere, respiciens facultatem expendentis, et dignitatem operis. Quod si minus infumat, quam dignitas operis requirat, dicitur Parvificentia: Si vero excedat, dicitur Banausia a furno, qui omnia consumit, et potest dici Consumptio, ut ait D. Thom. art. 2.
Note that the discourse here is about Magnificence as it is a virtue concerning the passions; it is not, in another and different way, also a virtue toward another, concerning actions.
Adverte, sermonem hic esse de Magnificentia, pro ut est virtus circa passiones; non alia diversa ratione etiam est virtus ad alterum circa operationes.