Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica

Question III: On vindication

English · Latin · Both

1.

VINDICATION is defined by D. Bonavent. 3. part. Centil. sect. 44. and in the declaratorio terminorum Theologiae: Vindication is the virtue by which force, or injury, and absolutely everything that would harm, is repelled by defending, or avenging. Or: It is the virtue by which everything unjust is repelled and duly punished.

2.

HENCE certain conditions are required, that a vindication be good.

3.

THE FIRST is, that the intention be good, not resting in the evil from which vengeance is taken; for that would be to be overcome by evil, against the Apostle, Rom. 12. but it is necessary that the mind of the avenger be carried principally toward the good to come from the punishment of the sinner, namely, either for the amendment, or at least for the restraint of the sinner himself, and the quiet of others, the preservation of peace, and the honor of God, as D. Thom. teaches, art. 1.

4.

THE SECOND condition is, that vengeance, properly so called, be done by one having power, which only a superior is, as is had in Rom. 13. For he is God's minister: an avenger in wrath upon him who does evil. as D. Thom. says, quaest. 108. art. 1. ad 1.

5.

THE THIRD is, that it be done according to the order of law and due moderation, lest the punishment exceed the fault.

6.

VINDICATION can be done through any kinds of punishments defined by the laws. So D. Thom. art. 3. The reason is, because vindication is licit insofar as it tends to restrain evils; but men are restrained from sinning insofar as they fear to lose things they love more than what they gain by sinning; otherwise fear would not check sin. Whence it comes that vengeance for sin must be taken by the subtraction of all that a man loves most, such as life, possessions, etc.

7.

BUT S. Thom. warns, art. 1. ad 5. and art. 3. ad 1. that when the whole multitude sins, it is to be punished, either as to the whole sinful body, yet so that the good are not swept up in it; or as to a part, as the Saintly Doctor reports in Bibliis pauperum, cap. 105.

8.

THEREFORE vindication of sins is a principal part of justice. So S. Thom. art. 2. D. Bonavent. in the places cited, from M. Tullius lib. 2. de Inventione.

9.

YET Suarez opusc. ult. sect. 5. and others deny that vindicative justice is a special virtue.