Introduction — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Prologue
The most cunning Serpent, bent on utterly destroying the whole human race, attacked the very First-formed themselves, so that, their stock left undealt with, the virus conceived might diffuse itself more widely through all their posterity; in no other way do Heretics — especially in our own age, the most prolific of sectaries — have dared by impious audacity to cast a deadly Aconite into the very fountain of truth itself, so that from where the edifice of the Christian empire has risen the higher,1 from there it might fall to the ground root and branch; and with faith denied — resting upon the veracity of the First Truth — all the rest might readily be shown suspect of falsehood. Hence they insinuate into the credulous vulgar, in place of faith an empty confidence, in place of hope a presumption to be despaired of, and finally, in place of charity, an Impossibility of loving. So did these eminent little theologians learn to speak of God; thus Luther with his followers, while he grows insolent over his tumid certainty of salvation, concludes by an impious dogma that Christ the Lord underwent the penalties of the Abyss, no less in soul and body than in divinity; for so he proclaims his madness on Psalm 16, as our Boverius notes in his second examination on the unity of faith, article 5. Calvin, indeed, while he swells with the presumption of having justice imputed to himself, cries out that Christ the Savior was desperate in the very vestibule of his glory and amid the heaps of his merits: so he barks on Matthew 26, as Boverius also notes, exam. 1, Atheism 9. Finally, both hold the same view of charity, that with shameless brows they assert it was only ironically that God, as well as the commandments, prescribed it in those words of the Gospel: If you would enter into life, keep the commandments. Very many have professedly taken care to root out these, and others like them, errors, and indeed effectually; but by what means, or by what arguments, will become clear in the course of this treatise, whenever it falls to discuss each opinion or error according to the mind of St. Bonaventure. 1 Editor's note: the print reads 'Christiani Iuperij moles'; rendered 'of the Christian empire' ('imperii') because 'Iuperii' is not a Latin word and the antithesis (heretics casting poison into the very fountain from which the Christian edifice rose, that it might collapse from its source) requires 'imperii'.
ASTUTISSIMUS Serpens, totum prorsus perempturus hominum genus, ipsos Protoplastos adortus est, ut infecta stirps conceptum virus in totam propaginem latius diffunderet; Haud secus Heretici, hoc nostro praesertim saeculo, sectariorum feracissimo, in ipsum veritatis fontem lethale Aconitum iniicere nefario sunt ausu moliti, ut unde Christiani imperii moles altius surrexerit, inde radicitus corrueret; et negata fide, primae veritatis veracitate nixa, caetera quaeque falsitatis suspecta, facile arguerentur: Hinc pro fide inanem fiduciam, pro spe desperandam praesumptionem, pro denique charitate, dilectionis Impossibilitatem credulo Vulgo insinuant. Ita eximii hi Theologastri de Deo eloqui didicere; sic Lutherus cum sequacibus, dum in tumidam suae salutis certitudinem insolescit, Christum Dominum Barathri poenas, non minus anima, et corpore, quam divinitate subiisse, impio dogmate concludit; sic enim promit suam insaniam ad Psalm. 16. ut notat noster Boverius examine secundo de fidei unitate, art. 5. Calvinus vero, dum in imputandae sibi iustitiae praesumptionem intumescit, Christum Salvatorem in ipsius gloriae vestibulo, et inter meritorum cumulos desperabundum clamat: ita latrat ad 26. Matthaei, ut notat etiam Boverius exam. 1. Atheismo 9. De charitate denique ita sentit uterque, ut non nisi Ironice eam Deum, sicut et mandata, praecepisse perfrictis frontibus asserant in ea Evangelii verba: Si vis ingredi ad vitam, serva mandata. Hos, uti et caeteros huiusmodi, errores expungendos curarunt ex professo plurimi, et quidem efficaciter; sed cuius, vel quibus rationibus, in huius tractatus decursu patebit, dum unamquamque opinionem, errroremve ad mentem D. Bonaventurae discutere contigerit.