Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question I: What a contract is, and of how many kinds
CONTRACT is properly defined by Ulpian in Leg. Labeo, ff. de verborum signific., where he says: It is an obligation from one side and the other: the Doctors supply: Arising from the will and agreement of the parties. That is, a contract is a pact from which arises an obligation on both sides. Thus St. Bonaventure takes the definition of contract in 4. dist. 27 passim, and dist. 29 quaest. 2, in fundamentis, in corpore, et ad argumenta.
CONTRACTUS proprie definitur ab Ulpiano Leg. Labeo, ff. de verborum signific. ubi ait: Est ultro, citroque obligatio: subaudiunt Doctores: Ex partium voluntate, et pactione insurgens. Idest contractus est pactum, ex quo oritur utrinque obligatio. Sic accipit definitionem contractus D. Bonaventura in 4. dist. 27. passim, et dist. 29. quaest. 2. in fundamentis, in corpore, et ad argumenta.
THIS definition, or description, is handed down by its effect, that is, by the mutual obligation which results from the pact of the parties, as St. Bonaventure observes, in the places cited; wherefore it is rather a causal definition than a formal one, as Bonaventure notes, in dist. 3. de contract. quaest. 1. puncto 1.
TRADITUR autem haec definitio, sive descriptio per effectum, id est, per mutuam obligationem, quae ex pacto partium resultat, ut advertit D. Bonavent. locis adductis, quare est potius definitio causalis, quam formalis, ut notat Bonav. in dist. 3. de contract. quaest. 1. puncto 1.
Yet it can be said, with St. Bonaventure, 4. dist. 27. quaest. 2., that the obligation, or bond, of contract is taken in the definition according to the cause in intention, insofar namely as the will, intending the expressly drawn obligation, from both sides is the contract; and then the definition will be essential through the formal cause, which Suarez also observes, Lib. primo de voto, cap. 13. num. 11., and Fagundez, Lib. 1. cap. 2.
Potest tamen dici cum D. Bonavent. 4. dist. 27. quaest. 2. obligationem, seu ligamen contractus, in definitione sumi secundum causam in intentione, quatenus scilicet voluntas, intendens obligationem retra expressa, ex utraque parte est contractus, et tunc definitio erit essentialis per causam formalem, quod observant etiam Suarez Lib. primo de voto, cap. 13. num. 11. Fagundez Lib. 1. cap. 2.
From these you have that a pact extends more widely than strict contract. A pact is defined: It is the agreement and consent of two or more into the same thing. For in a pact an obligation can result from one side only, as in donations, where only the donor is obligated to give, not the donee to accept. Then, by force of a bare pact, a promise arises in the order of truth, not of justice; but in a contract an obligation of commutative justice arises, as St. Bonaventure teaches, 4. dist. 29. loco citato.
Ex his habes pactum latius patere rigoroso contractu. Definitur autem pactum: Est duorum, aut plurium in idem placitum, et consensus. In pacto enim potest resultare obligatio solum ex altera parte, ut in donationibus, solus donans obligatur dare, non vero donatarius accipere. Deinde oritur ex vi pacti nudi promissio in ratione veritatis, non iustitiae: In contractu vero oritur obligatio iustitiae commutativae, ut docet D. Bonavent. 4. dist. 29. loco citato.
HENCE also you have by what name certain conventions are called in which results the obligation of one party or parties from some office, for example of a Tutor, Curator, or steward; these, however, are called quasi-contracts. The definition is given by Fagundez, de contract. Lib. 1. cap. 2.: A quasi-contract is an obligation by which someone is bound to another not from any contract or wrongdoing, but from some office or act lawful and honest, even though no express will of either party intervenes.
HINC etiam habes, quo nomine appellentur aliquae conventiones, in quibus resultat obligatio partis, vel partium, ex officio aliquo, puta Tutoris, Curatoris, aut villici; dicuntur autem quasi contractus. Definitur vero apud Fagundez de contract. Lib. 1. cap. 2. Quasi contractus est obligatio, qua quis ligatur alteri, non ex aliquo contractu, aut maleficio, sed ex aliquo officio, vel facto licito, et honesto, licet non interveniat expressa voluntas utriusque.
THEREFORE IT IS MOST CERTAIN that in contracts the consent of both parties is necessary, as the Holy Doctor often repeats, in 4. dist. 27. 28. et 29., Molina, Tom. 2. disp. 254., Lessius, Tom. 1. Lib. 2. cap. 17. dub. 2., Azor., part. 3. lib. 6. cap. 2., Bonacina, de contract. in genere, disp. 3. quaest. 1. puncto 2., Sanchez, Lib. primo de matrim. disp. 8. et lib. 4. decal. cap. 1., Suarez, tomo 2. de relig. lib. 2. de iuram. cap. 7., Fagundez, Lib. 1. cap. 2. num. 2., Tannerus, disp. 4. quaest. 7. dub. 1.
CERTISSIMUM est igitur, in contractibus necessarium esse consensum utriusque partis, ut saepe repetit S. Doctor in 4. dist. 27. 28. et 29. Molina Tom. 2. disp. 254. Lessius Tom. 1. Lib. 2. cap. 17. dub. 2. Azor. part. 3. lib. 6. cap. 2. Bonacina de contract. in genere, disp. 3. quaest. 1. puncto 2. Sanchez Lib. primo de matrim. disp. 8. et lib. 4. decal. cap. 1. Suarez tomo 2. de relig. lib. 2. de iuram. cap. 7. Fagundez Lib. 1. cap. 2. num. 2. Tannerus disp. 4. quaest. 7. dub. 1.
THERE ARE MANY kinds of contracts, as St. Bonaventure teaches, in the places cited, and in speculo animae, cap. 1. 2. et 4.
MULTA sunt genera contractuum, ut docet D. Bonavent. locis adductis, et in speculo animae, cap. 1. 2. et 4.
THEY ARE DIVIDED into Nominated and Unnominated. A nominated contract is one which has its proper name, as Lease, Hiring, Sale, Deposit, and Settlement.
DIVIDUNTUR in Nominatos, et Innominatos. Nominatus contractus est, qui proprium nomen habet, ut Locatio, Conductio, Venditio, Depositum, et Transactio.
UNNOMINATED contracts are those which lack a proper name, and they are reduced almost to these four modes: Do, ut des, e.g. Give me a horse, that you give me wheat. Do, ut facias: I give you wheat, that you till my field. Facio, ut facias, e.g. I till your field, that you build me a house. Facio, ut des. I till your field, that you give me wheat. These are treated in L. ge. Naturalis, ff. de praescriptis verbis. But these contracts are regulated according to the Nominated ones.
INNOMINATI contractus sunt, qui carent nomine proprio, et fere ad hos quatuor modos reducuntur: Do, ut des, v. g. Da equum, ut des triticum. Do, ut facias: Do triticum, ut colas agrum. Facio, ut facias, v. g. Colo tibi agrum, ut domum mihi aedifices. Facio, ut des. Colo tibi agrum, ut des mihi triticum. De his agitur L. ge. Naturalis, ff. de praescriptis verbis. Hi vero contractus regulantur iuxta Nominatos.
NOMINATED contracts are divided into contracts of good faith and of strict law.
NOMINATI dividuntur in Contractus bonae fidei, et stricti iuris.
CONTRACTS OF GOOD FAITH are those in which Judges decide not so much in the rigor of law and pact as from equity and good.
CONTRACTUS bonae fidei sunt, in quibus Iudices decernunt non tam in rigore iuris, et pactionis, quam ex aequo, et bono.
CONTRACTS OF STRICT LAW are those in which judges proceed by the rigor of law.
CONTRACTUS vero stricti iuris dicuntur, in quibus iudices procedunt rigore iuris.
CONTRACTS OF GOOD FAITH are Purchase, Sale, Lease, Hiring, Procuratorship, or Mandate for the management of affairs, Deposit, Loan for use, Insurance, Partnership, Guardianship, Pledging, the right of dividing an estate among heirs, division of common property among several. Likewise when a thing is given to someone that he may return it, or its price. But the other contracts, as Emphyteusis, quaest. 5. num. 32., and Exchanges, are of strict law, as Rebellius teaches, 2. part. lib. 1. quaest. 2., Molina, Tom. 2. de iustitia, disput. 259., Valascus, de emphyt. quaest. 5., Fagundez, cap. 1. num. 8., who, against others, approve this division not only in the external forum but also in the forum of the soul.
CONTRACTUS bonae fidei sunt Emptio, Venditio, Locatio, Conductio, Procuratio, seu negotiorum gestorum Mandatum, Depositum, Commodatum, Assecuratio, Societas, Tutela, Pignoratio, Ius dividendae facultatis inter haeredes, divisio rei communis inter diversos. Item quando alicui datur res ut illam reddat, vel pretium eius. Caeteri vero contractus, ut Emphytheusis quaest. 5. num. 32. et Permutationes, sunt stricti iuris, ut docent Rebellius 2. part. lib. 1. quaest. 2. Molina Tom. 2. de iustitia, disput. 259. Valascus de emphyt. quaest. 5. Fagundez cap. 1. num. 8. qui contra alios approbant hanc divisionem, non modo in foro externo, sed etiam in foro animae.
BUT WHETHER betrothals ought to be reckoned among contracts of strict law; Sanchez, Lib. 1. de matrim. disp. 64. num. 3., supposes, as certain, that they are of good faith, from which it can be inferred that betrothals to which fraud gave occasion are invalid, because contracts of good faith to which fraud gave occasion are invalid; and this seems to be the mind of St. Bonaventure, in 4. dist. 27. dub. 2. litterali.
UTRUM vero sponsalia debeant computari inter contractus stricti iuris; Sanchez Lib. 1. de matrim. disp. 64. num. 3. supponit, tanquam certum, esse bonae fidei, ex quo potest inferri sponsalia, quibus dolus causam dedit, esse invalida, quia invalidi sunt contractus bonae fidei, quibus dolus causam dedit, et hoc videtur sentire D. Bonavent. in 4. dist. 27. dub. 2. litterali.
NOMINATED contracts are divided into Onerous and Lucrative. Lucrative are those in which something is remitted, promised, or given to someone without any burden or compensation of justice, but merely gratuitously, as donation, acceptilation, loan for use, as to the use of the thing; for although the borrower is bound to restore the thing, yet the use is liberal. Onerous contracts are those on which a burden falls on both sides, as in purchase. To this division are reduced contracts Respective and non-Respective. Respective are those in which obligation results from both sides, and they are proper contracts. Non-respective, in which obligation results from one side only, are less proper, as stipulation and promise.
DIVIDUNTUR contractus nominati in Onerosos, et Lucrativos. Lucrativi sunt in quibus absque ullo onere, aut recompensatione ex iustitia, sed mere gratis aliquid alicui remittitur, promittitur, vel datur, ut donatio, acceptilatio, commodatum, quo ad usum rei; nam licet commodatarius teneatur restituere rem, tamen usus est liberalis. Onerosi contractus sunt, quibus ex utraque parte onus incumbit, ut in emptione. Ad hanc divisionem reducuntur contractus Respectivi, et non Respectivi. Respectivi sunt, quibus ex utraque parte obligatio resultat, et sunt contractus proprii. Non respectivi, in quibus ex una tantum parte resultat obligatio, ut sunt minus proprii, ut stipulatio, et promissio.
IF contract be taken for pact, it is divided into Bare and Clothed. A bare pact is one in which only the agreement of the parties intervenes and nothing further has been done, and no other foundation is present. Clothed is that which is strengthened by solemnities, or is invested with some circumstance in which it is confirmed by civil law.
SI contractus accipiatur pro pacto, dividitur in Nudum, et Vestitum. Nudum pactum est, in quo sola intervenit conventio partium, et ad nihil amplius est processum, et nullum aliud fundamentum adest. Vestitum est, quod solemnitatibus roboratur, vel aliqua circumstantia induitur, in qua iure civili roboratur.
IT IS CLOTHED, moreover, in six ways. First in the thing, if it be fulfilled at least on one side. Secondly by words, if stipulation is added. Thirdly by writing, as if by a letter you acknowledged that satisfaction had already been made to you, even if it had not been made, which is called Acceptilation. Fourthly by the specific name of contract; by which reason all contracts which are perfected by consent, indeed all nominated contracts, are clothed, if they are perfect in their kind. Fifthly by oath. Sixthly by coherence with some clothed contract, as if I sell you a house for a thousand gold pieces with the pact that I may still dwell in it, and give you this garment for my dwelling; this accessory pact of itself is a bare pact, yet because it coheres with the sale it is also clothed, because the accessory follows the nature of the principal.
VESTITUR autem sex modis. Primo in re, si ex altera saltem parte sit impletum. Secundo verbis, si accedat stipulatio. Tertio scriptura, ut si littera fatearis, esse tibi iam satisfactum, etiamsi satisfactum non sit, quod dicitur Acceptilatio. Quarto specifico, nomine contractus; qua ratione omnes contractus, qui consensu perficiuntur, imo omnes contractus nominati, sunt vestiti, si in suo genere sint perfecti. Quinto iuramento. Sexto cohaerentia cum aliquo contractu vestito, ut si vendam tibi domum mille aureis cum pacto, ut illam adhuc inhabitem, et tibi pro inhabitatione dem hanc vestem; hoc pactum accessorium per se est pactum nudum, quia tamen cohaeret cum venditione, est etiam vestitum, quia accessorium sequitur naturam principalis.
IT IS DIVIDED also into a Guarentigium contract and a non-Guarentigium one.
DIVIDITUR etiam in contractum Guarentigium, et non Guarentigium.
A GUARENTIGIUM is one that has execution ready at hand, because of the oath placed in it, or a hypothec, or a public instrument in which the right of executing it is conceded without awaiting the judge's sentence.
GUARENTIGIUS est qui paratam habet executionem, propter iuramentum in illo positum, vel hypothecam, vel instrumentum publicum, in quo conceditur ius exequendi illum, non expectata iudicis sententia.
A NON-GUARENTIGIUS is one that lacks these securities. So Molina, tract. 1. disp. 71., Lessius, Lib. 2. c. 28. dub. 1., Fagundez, cap. 1. in fine.
NON Guarentigius est ille, qui his firmitatibus caret. Ita Molina tract. 1. disp. 71. Lessius Lib. 2. c. 28. dub. 1. Fagundez cap. 1. in fine.