Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question I: What envy is, and what its object is
English · Latin · BothHide topicsShow topics
On Envy the Fathers have written many splendid things: Cyprian, serm. de Invid., Basil homil. 11. et 21., Chrysostom homil. 44. et 45., Cassian collat. 18., Prosper lib. 3. de vita contemplativa, cap. 9., and others as gathered by St. Bonaventure, Lib. 2. Pharetrae, cap. 8., where, drawing on St. Gregory (Lib. 2. moral. cap. 20. Lib. 3. cap. 17.), he lists the daughters of Envy, which are Hatred, Whispering, Detraction, Anger; and others, from other Fathers, chiefly St. Augustine (de disciplina Christiana, cap. 1.) and Jerome (epist. 99.), where they call it a diabolical vice.
De Invidia multa praeclare scripserunt PP. Cyprianus, serm. de Invid., Basil. homil. 11. et 21. Chrystostomus homil. 44. et 45. Cassianus collat. 18. Prosper lib. 3. de vita contemplativa, cap. 9. et alii apud D. Bonavent. Lib. 2. Pharetrae, cap. 8. ubi ex D. Gregorio Lib. 2. moral. cap. 20. Lib. 3. cap. 17. refert Invidiae filias; quae sunt Odium, Susurratio, Detractio, Ira; et aliae, ex aliis Patribus, praecipue D. Augustino de disciplina Christiana, cap. 1. Hieronymo epist. 99. ubi eam vocant diabolicam culpam.
Envy is defined by all as: Sadness over the neighbor's good, judged as an evil of one's own, insofar as by comparison it diminishes the excellence of one's own good. So the Socratic Doctor (opusc. explic. Terminorum Theologiae; et p. p. censil. sect. 19.). Hence Aristotle (Lib. 2. Rhet. cap. 9.) says the cause of Envy is equality, or similarity, and proximity. And the Saints have similar things: Augustine in Psalm. 104., as gathered by St. Bonaventure loc. adducto, Damascene Lib. 2. cap. 24. St. Augustine also, Lib. 11. de Genes. ad litt. cap. 14., describes Envy, saying: Since each loves his own excellence, he envies equals, that they be made equal to him; inferiors, lest they be made equal to him; superiors, because they are not made equal to him; etc. The same is taught by the Angelic Doctor (p. p. censil. sect. 19.). Hence also Lucan sang:
Invidia ab omnibus definitur: Tristitia de bono alieno proximi, aestimato ut malo proprio, quatenus per comparationem imminuit proprii boni excellentiam. Ita S. Doctor opusc. explic. Terminorum Theologiae; et p. p. censil. sect. 19. Ideo Aristoteles Lib. 2. Rhet. cap. 9. ait, causam Invidiae esse aequalitatem, vel similitudinem, et propinquitatem. Et similia habent Sancti, Augustinus in Psalm. 104. apud D. Bonavent. loc. adducto, Damascenus Lib. 2. cap. 24. Etiam D. Augustinus Lib. 11. de Genes. ad litt. cap. 14. describit Invidiam dicens: Amando quisque excellentiam suam, vel paribus invidet, quod ei coaequentur, vel inferioribus, ne sibi coaequentur; vel superioribus, quod ei non coaequantur; etc. Idem docet S. Doctor p. p. censil. sect. 19. Unde etiam cecinit Lucanus,
— Emulous virtue gave the spur, and now each can no longer bear that Caesar be before him, or Pompey his equal. —
— Stimulos dedit aemula virtus, Nec quemquam iam ferre potest, Caesarve priorem; Pompeiusve parem. —
Therefore not only the surpassing good of one's neighbor begets Envy, but anything even equal, insofar as it is apprehended as diminishing our excellence or impeding our surpassing others. In this sense St. Gregory is to be understood, Lib. 5. moral. cap. 33. We cannot envy except those whom we think better than ourselves in some respect; for he does not call them better simply, but insofar as they diminish our excellence, as Tancretus noted (disp. 2. quaest. 6. dub. 1.), Valencia (disp. 3. quaest. 14. puncto 1.). Hence St. Augustine (Lib. 11. in Genes. cap. 15.), as cited by St. Bonaventure loco cit., says the differences of envy are three: namely, envying superiors, because one is not their equal; equals, because they prosper for the better; inferiors, lest they be made equal to oneself. But one must note that Envy agrees with the other three affections in the character of sadness, but differs by the other parts of the definition, as the Angelic Doctor indicates (p. p. Censil. sect. 19. et in speculo animae, cap. 1.).
Igitur non modo bonum praecellens proximi parit Invidiam, sed quodlibet etiam aequale, quatenus minuere nostram excellentiam apprehenditur, aut praecellentiam impedire. Quo sensu intelligendus D. Gregorius Lib. 5. moral. cap. 33. Invidere non possumus nisi eis, quos nobis in aliquo meliores putamus, non enim meliores vocat simpliciter, sed quatenus minuunt nostram excellentiam, ut adnotavit Tancretus disp. 2. quaest. 6. dub. 1. Valentia disp. 3. quaest. 14. puncto 1. Hinc D. Augustinus Lib. 11. in Genes. cap. 15. apud D. Bonavent. loco cit. ait, differentias invidiae esse tres, nempe, Invidere superioribus, quia eis non aequantur: Paribus, quia in melius prosperantur: Inferioribus, ne ei aequentur. Oportet autem advertere, Invidiam in ratione Tristitiae convenire cum aliis tribus affectibus; sed differre per alias particulas definitionis, ut indicat S. Doctor p. p. Censil. sect. 19. et in speculo animae, cap. 1.
For first, there is a certain effect of fear, which is sadness over another's good insofar as it is feared to bring ruin upon us; and this is not a sin, as is clear from Aristotle loco cit. and St. Thomas (hic art. 1. et 2.) and St. Bonaventure in speculo animae. The envious man, however, is not saddened over another's good under this aspect, but as in fact judged to surpass him in his own excellence.
Primo enim datur quidam effectus timoris, qui est tristitia de bono alterius, quatenus timetur allaturus perniciem nobis; neque est peccatum, ut constat ex Aristotele loco cit. et D. Thom. hic art. 1. et 2. et D. Bonavent. in speculo animae. Invidus vero non sub hac ratione tristatur de bono alieno, sed ut de facto aestimati alium supereminente propriae excellentiae.
The second effect, similar to Envy, is when one is saddened not over another's good, so as to envy it, but over his own deficiency, insofar as he himself does not have that good; and this is not a sin, as St. Bonaventure says. This affection is called zeal and emulation, as the Philosopher teaches (Lib. 2. Rhet. cap. 11. and St. Thomas art. 1.). But Envy is saddened over another's good insofar as it diminishes one's own excellence. Hence 1 John cap. 3. says, For this reason Cain slew his brother, because his brother's works were just. Here the Angelic Doctor notes that Envy is sometimes called by the name of anger, Genes. 4. Why are you angry? where the Gloss reads: you are tormented by envy; sometimes by the name of hatred: His brothers hated him, Genes. 37.; sometimes by the name of emulation, 1 Kings 1. Her rival afflicted her. To this belongs what Nyssenus says, Lib. de vita Moysi: The envious man grieves at the happiness of others, and rejoices in their calamities. And Chrysostom, homil. 44. ad pop. Why do you grieve, O man, at your neighbor's goods? We ought to grieve at the evils we suffer, not at the goods by which we seem to be held in esteem by others. Therefore this sin is without any pardon. And Isidore, Lib. 3. sent. cap. 25. There is no virtue that has not for its contrary the evil of Envy; only misery is without envy.
Secundus effectus Invidiae similis est, cum quis tristatur, non de bono alterius, ut Invideat, sed de suo defectu, quatenus et ipse illud bonum non habet; et hoc non est peccatum, ut ait S. Bonavent. Hic affectus dicitur zelus et aemulatio, ut docet Philosophus Lib. 2. Rhet. cap. 11. et D. Thom. art. 1. Invidia vero tristatur de bono alterius, quatenus minuit propriam excellentiam. Unde prima Ioan. cap. 3. dicitur, Propterea Cain occidisse fratrem, quia fratris opera erant iusta. Ubi advertit S. Doctor aliquando Invidiam nomine irae vocari, Genes. 4. Quare irasceris? ubi Glossa: livore torqueris: Aliquando nomine odii: Oderant eum fratres, Genes. 37. Aliquando nomine aemulationis, primo Reg. 1. Affligebat eam aemula eius. Eo pertinet id, quod ait Nyssenus Lib. de vita Moysi: Invidus felicitate aliorum dolet, calamitatibus gaudet. Et Chrysostomus homil. 44. ad pop. Cur doles, o homo, proximi bonis? Dolere nos oportebat iis, quae patimur malis, non bonis, in quibus aliis probabiles haberi videmur. Propterea omni venia caret istud peccatum. Et Isidorus, Lib. 3. sent. cap. 25. Nulla est virtus, quae non habeat contrarium Invidiae malum: sola miseria caret invidia.
The third affection, similar to Envy, is sadness over another's good insofar as we judge him unworthy of that good; and this affection is called Nemesis, or Indignation. So Aristotle loco cit. cap. 9.; and St. Bonaventure asserts that this affection, with regard to temporal goods, which more often bring ruin, is not a sin (in speculo animae, supra citato.). See him also, Lib. primo de profectu Religiosi, cap. 13. Hence St. Gregory (in Pastorali, part. 3. cap. 1. admon. 23.) says: It often happens that, without losing Charity, we are gladdened by the ruin of an enemy, and again saddened by his glory without the guilt of envy: since we believe in our mind that some are thereby well raised up; and as he advances, we fear that very many are unjustly oppressed. So reports St. Bonaventure, Lib. 3. Pharetrae, cap. 21.
Tertius affectus, similis Invidiae, est tristitia de bono alterius, quatenus illum aestimamus eo bono indignum, et hic affectus dicitur Nemesis, sive Indignatio. Ita Aristoteles loco cit. cap. 9. et hunc affectum quo ad bona temporalia, quae saepius ruinam afferunt, non esse peccatum, asserit S. Bonavent. in speculo animae, supra citato. Vide ipsum etiam Lib. primo de profectu Religiosi, cap. 13. Unde S. Gregorius in Pastorali, part. 3. cap. 1. admon. 23. ait: Evenire plerumque solet, ut non amissa Charitate, nos inimici ruina laetificet, et rursum eius gloria sine invidiae culpa nos contristet: dum et mente eo, quosdam bene erigi credimus; et proficiente eo, plerosque iniuste opprimi formidamus. Ita refert S. Bonavent. Lib. 3. Pharetrae, cap. 21.
From what has been said it follows that Envy does not exist among those who are not equals or similar in some state, as Aristotle teaches (cap. 10.); for among these only the excellence of one obscures the excellence of the other. Hence he infers that neither the dead, nor those most remote at the pillars of Hercules, are envied; but envy, he says, exists among neighbors and rivals, and among those who desire and strive for the same things, whence the saying: The potter envies the potter, and the smith the smith.
Ex dictis sequitur, Invidiam non esse inter eos, qui in aliquo statu non sint aequales, vel similes, ut docet Aristoteles cap. 10. nam inter hos tantum per unius praestantiam, Excellentia alterius obscuratur. Hinc deducit, nec mortuis, nec remotissimis ad columnas Herculis invideri: sed invidiam, ait, esse inter proximos, et rivales; et inter eos, qui eadem cupiunt, et intendunt, unde dictum est: Figulus figulo invidet; faberque fabro.
Hence you infer that those prone to envy are the faint-hearted, since to them all things seem great, as St. Gregory noted above; to this Job 5: Envy slays the small one. On the contrary, the magnanimous are free from envy, as Silius Italicus says. See Valencia.
Hinc deduces, eos invidiae obnoxios, qui pusillanimes sunt, quippe eis omnia videntur magna, ut adnotat D. Gregorius supra, ad id Iob. 5. Parvulum occidit Invidia. E contra, magnanimi invidia carent, ut ait Silius Italicus. Vide Valentiam.
From all these things the Angelic Doctor concludes in the place cited in the Summa that Envy is opposed to piety, which arises from Charity.
Ex his omnibus colligit S. Doctor loco cit. Gentil. Invidiam opponi pietati, quae ex Charitate orta est.