Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question IV: What penalties are established for false witnesses
A false witness offends God, the Judges, and the litigating party, and commits in one sin a threefold deformity, which must be expounded in confession: perjury against God, injustice against men, against whom he gives false testimony; and a lie against the Judge, by which he perverts the forensic judgment. On this account heavy penalties are established for them in the law, as Fagundez teaches, cap. 43, after D. Bonaventura in the places cited, especially in the Diaeta, tit. 3, cap. 7. The same is found in the Canon law, cap. 1, de crimine falsi, where he says so threefold a penalty is to be inflicted on the false witness.
Quae poenae statutae sint falsis Testibus.
TESTIS falsus Deum, Iudices, et partem litigantem offendit, triplicemque in uno peccato committit deformitatem, necessario in confessione explicandam; periurii in Deum, iniustitiae in homines, contra quos falsum dicit testimonium; et mendacium in Iudicem, quo iudicium forense pervertit, ob id graves poenae in iure eis statuuntur, ut docet Fagundez cap. 43. post D. Bonaventuram locis citatis, praecipue in Diaeta, tit. 3. cap. 7. Idipsum habetur in iure Canonico, cap. 1. de crimine falsi, ubi triplicem adeo poenam ait infligendam falso testi.
FIRST, because he offends God by his perjury, a fast on bread and water for forty days is imposed on him, and for seven years other penance besides, as appears from C. Quicumque, quaest. 1, and the Gloss there, and D. Bonaventura reports it in the confessionali, cap. 3, particula 18.
PRIMO enim quia periurio suo Deum offendit, ieiunium ei in pane, et aqua quadraginta dierum, et per septennium alia etiam poenitentia indicitur, ut patet ex C. Quicumque, quaest. 1. et Glossa ibi, et refert D. Bonavent. in confessionali, cap. 3. particula 18.
SECOND, because he mocked the Judge and perverted the public order of law, he is marked with infamy, C. si quis convictus, 2, quaest. 5.
SECUNDO, quia Iudicem delusit, et publicum iuris ordinem pervertit, notatur infamia, C. si quis convictus, 2. quaest. 5.
THIRD, because he injured his neighbor, he is punished according to the manner and measure of the injury, that is, by as much penalty as is established by law. So Farinacius, quaest. 67, part. 309, and others whom he cites. The same author, num. 9, notes that a false witness must be condemned far more heavily, both in a case of death and in a civil or criminal case, than the Defendant is to be condemned; which Ananias also teaches on cap. 1, de crim. falsi, and there Butrius num. 6; Iason on the Leg. Et si legibus, at the end of the Cod. si contra ius, vel utilitatem publicam; Gomez on the law Tauri, 87; Penna in direct. Inquisit., part. 3, quaest. 73, com. 122, fol. 675.
TERTIO, quia proximum laesit, punitur iuxta modum, et mensuram laesionis, idest quantis poena, iure statuta. Ita Farinacius quaest. 67. part. 309. et alii, quos allegat. Idem num. 9. advertit multo gravius damnandum falsum testem, tam in causa mortis, quam in causa civili, vel criminali; quam damnandus sit Reus; quod idem docet etiam Ananias in cap. 1. de crim. falsi, et ibi Butrius num. 6. Iason in Leg. Et si legibus, ad finem Cod. si contra ius, vel utilitatem publicam, Gomez ad legem Tauri, 87. Penna in direct. Inquisit. part. 3. quaest. 73. com. 122. fol. 675.
MOREOVER, the penalty of a false witness is that he is no longer believed in the judicial forum, even in true matters. Hence, although credit is given to other criminals, it is never given to liars. The Saintly Doctor proves this from the place recently adduced, from C. Quicumque, which is a decree of Pope Fabian, who decrees that such a one should never be without penance and never be received in testimony. So also Bartolus on the Leg. transigere, de transact., and commonly the Canonists on the cap. fraternitatis, de crimine falsi, where Innocent, Ioan. Andreas, Zabarella, and Ananias attest this.
PRAETEREA testis falsi poena est, quod ei non amplius in foro iudiciali, in veris etiam, non creditur. Unde, licet aliis criminosis fides habeatur, falsidicis tamen nunquam. Id probat S. Doctor loco nuper adducto, ex C. Quicumque, quod est decretum Fabiani Papae qui decernit, ut is nunquam sit sine poenitentia, et nunquam in testimonium recipiatur. Ita etiam Bartolus in Leg. transigere, de transact. et communiter Canonistae in cap. fraternitatis, de crimine falsi, ubi Innocentius, Ioan. Andreas, Zabarella, Ananias id testantur.
A FOURTH penalty is deposition, if he is a cleric; some derive it from the c. Cum non ab homine, de iudiciis. This, however, is not observed, as I gather from D. Bonaventura in the confessionali, where, though recounting the other penalties, he does not append this one; and so Ananias notes at the place cited, and Fagundez num. 9, who at num. 26, with Ananias, notes that one must be punished for the crime of falsity who conceals the truth when he has sworn to speak it. It is gathered from the cap. Cum dilecti, de accusat.
QUARTA poena est depositio, si clericus sit; si eam deducunt aliqui ex c. Cum non ab homine, de iudiciis. Hoc tamen non servatur, ut colligo ex D. Bonavent. in confessionali, ubi hanc poenam non apponit, alias recensens; et ita advertit Ananias loco cit. et Fagundez num. 9. qui num. 26. cum Anania advertit, crimine falsi puniendum, qui veritatem tacet, cum iuraverit dicere. Colligitur ex cap. Cum dilecti, de accusat.
By the civil law, formerly, by Leg. 12 Tabularum, false witnesses were hurled headlong from the Tarpeian rock, as Aulus Gellius testifies, Lib. 20 of his Attic Nights, cap. 1; Simanca de Cathol. Instit., titulo 64, num. 83; Tiraquellus de poenis, caus. 31, num. 29.
IURE civili olim Leg. 12. Tabularum, testes falsi e Saxo Tarpeio praecipites agebantur, teste Aulo Gellio, Lib. 20. suarum noctium Atticarum, cap. 1. Simanca de Cathol. Instit. titulo 64. num. 83. Tiraquell. de poenis, caus. 31. num. 29.
AFTERWARD this penalty seemed too harsh, and in its place succeeded the penalty of deportation with publication of all goods, if the man were free; but if a slave, he is afflicted with the ultimate punishment, by the common Imperial law, Leg. 1 in princip. ff. ad Legem Corneliam de falsis, joined with the §. finalis, and Leg. si divino, ff. de poenis; and Angelus Perusinus notes it in addit. circa materiam de restam. post numerum 15, Abbas in cap. 1. de crim. falsi, num. 6, Simanchus de Cathol. Instit. tit. 64 num. 89, Marianus Socinus in cap. 1. de crimine falsi, num. 109. But one who compels another to testify falsely is punished with the same penalty, as Ananias teaches loco cit., and Fagundez cap. 43. num. 3, D. Bonaventura speculo animae, cap. 2, ad finem.
POSTEA haec poena nimis acerba visa est, et eius loco poena deportationis cum publicatione omnium bonorum, si homo esset liber, successit; si autem servus, ultimo supplicio afficitur, de Iure communi Imperiali Leg. 1. in princip. ff. ad Legem Corneliam de falsis, iuncto §. finali, et Leg. si divino, ff. de poenis, et advertunt Angelus Perusinus in addit. circa materiam de restam. post numerum 15. Abbas in cap. 1. de crim. falsi, num. 6. Simanch. de Cathol. Instit. tit. 64 num. 89. Marianus Socinus in cap. 1. de crimine falsi, num. 109. compellens vero ad testificandum falsum, eadem poena punitur, ut docent Ananias loco cit. et Fagundez cap. 43. num. 3. D. Bonavent. speculo animae, cap. 2. ad finem.
SIMILARLY also a wavering and contradictory witness is punished with the penalty of the false witness, Leg. qui falso, and there the Gloss, ff. de testibus, and Leg. eas, ff. de falsis. So hold Abbas, Aretinus, and Butrius in cap. Cum in tua, de rest.; Baldus, Bossius, Clarus, Foller, and Farinacius, who cites others, quaest. 66, num. 56; and Bictus, quaest. 47, numero 21.
SIMILITER et testis varius, et contrarius punitur poena falsi testis, Leg. qui falso, et ibi Glossa, ff. de testibus, et Leg. eas, ff. de falsis. Ita tenent Abbas, Aretin. et Butrius in cap. Cum in tua, de rest. Baldus, Bossius, Clarus, Foller. et Farinacius, qui alios citat, quaest. 66. num. 56. et Bictus quaest. 47. numero 21.
NOTE, however, that a witness who contradicts himself must be reconciled as far as possible. See the ways of accomplishing this in Farinacius a num. 369.
ADVERTE tamen, testem, ne sibi contrarius sit, esse pro viribus concordandum. Vide modos id praestandi in Farinacio a num. 369.
IN the Venetian state a paper cap, painted with little devils, is placed on false witnesses, and sitting in a high place of the Piazza they are mocked; soon the tip of the tongue is cut off by the executioner, and he is driven into exile.
FALSIS testibus in statu Veneto imponitur pileus papyraceus, daemoniolis depictus, et in alto loco Plateae sedens illuditur, mox ei linguae apex praeciditur a carnifice, et in exilium pellitur.
Matters pertaining to the essence of the oath and of perjury, insofar as it is against God, are treated quite differently in the Tract. de religione, disput. de iuramento; for now we have dealt with it insofar as it is against justice.
QUAE spectant ad essentiam iuramenti, et periurii, prout est contra Deum, satis dissentientur Tract. de religione, disput. de iuramento; nunc enim egimus de eo, prout est contra iustitiam.