Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question I: What simony is, and of how many kinds
SIMONY is a studied will to buy, or sell a spiritual thing, or one annexed to the spiritual. So D. Thomas here, and D. Bonaventure p. p. centil. sect. 30. and in the opusc. Declaratio terminorum Theol. and in speculo animae, cap. 2.
Quid sit SIMONIA, et quotuplex.
SIMONIA est studiosa voluntas emendi, aut vendendi rem spiritualem, vel spirituali adnexam. Ita D. Thom. hic, et D. Bonavent. p. p. centil. sect. 30. et in opusc. Declaratio terminorum Theol. et in speculo animae, cap. 2.
The Saintly Doctor teaches, in 4. dist. 25. dub. 2., why those who sell spiritual things are called Simoniacs rather than Gezites; for Giezi sold the grace of miracles; but Simon wished to buy it.
DOCET autem S. Doctor in 4. dist. 25. dub. 2. cur vendentes res spirituales Simoniaci potius, quam Gezitae vocentur; nam Giezi vendidit gratiam miraculorum; Simon autem eam emere voluit.
He answers, that it is done because Simon here wished to traffic in the grace of the new testament, at the time of grace revealed, and wished to buy a greater grace, and to strike a pact.
RESPONDET, id fieri, quia hic mercari voluit gratiam novi testamenti, tempore gratiae revelatae, et maiorem gratiam voluit emere, et pactum inire.
Therefore the Saintly Doctor observes in the places cited, and with him D. Thomas and the rest, that the spiritual is here distinguished threefold. First spiritual in essence, as are grace, and the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and the supernatural virtues. Secondly spiritual causally, as are the Sacraments, instituted for causing grace. Similarly Ecclesiastical offices. Thirdly spiritual in effect, as are the acts of thanksgivings, of orders, and of the offices of the Church.
IDEO observat S. Doctor locis adductis, et com eo D. Thom. ac caeteri, spirituale triplex hic distingui. Primum per essentiam, ut sunt gratia, et dona S. Spiritus, ac virtutes supernae. Secundum spirituale causaliter, ut sunt Sacramenta, ad causandam gratiam instituta. Similiter officia Ecclesiastica. Tertium spirituale effectu, ut sunt actus gratiarum, ordinum, et officiorum Ecclesiae.
That which is ANNEXED to the spiritual is also twofold... it is annexed in three ways. First antecedently, as are sacred ornaments, vessels, temples, and any sacramentals whatsoever. Likewise the Right of patronage, presentations, elections, renunciations, collations, all of which are referred antecedently to Ecclesiastical benefices. Secondly accompanying, as is the labor itself to be undergone in the administration of sacred things, or of Ecclesiastical offices. Thirdly annexed consequently, as is the right of receiving the fruits, and revenues of the Church, on account of the spiritual ministry, and office.
ADNEXUM etiam spirituale est tripliciter. Primum antecedenter, ut ornamenta sacra, vasa, templa, et sacramentalia quaelibet. Item Ius patronatus, praesentationes, electiones, renunciationes, collationes, quae omnia antecedenter ad beneficia Ecclesiastica referuntur. Secundum comitantes, ut est labor ipse in administratione sacrorum, aut officiorum Ecclesiasticorum subeundus. Tertium adnexum consequenter, ut est ius percipiendi fructus, et redditus Ecclesiae, propter spirituale ministerium, et officium.
By purchase, and sale the Theologians understand any contract whatsoever, not gratuitous, by which a spiritual thing is compensated with a price; whether that be a gift which is called of the hand, as money, which is received by hand; or a gift from service, as service, help, etc.; or a gift from the tongue, as human praise, or intercession for acquiring human favor, according to the can. Salvator, 1. quaest. 3. and D. Thomas art. 5. and D. Bonaventure in speculo, loco cit. Tanner. disp. 5. quaest. 8. dubio 2.
Per emptionem, et venditionem intelligitur a Theologis quivis contractus, non gratuitus, quo res spiritualis pretio compensatur; sive illud sit munus, quod a manu dicitur, ut pecunia, quae manu accipitur; sive sit munus ab obsequio, ut servitium, auxilium, etc. sive sit munus a lingua, ut humana laudatio, vel deprecatio ad acquirendum humanum favorem, iuxta can. Salvator, 1. quaest. 3. et D. Thom. art. 5. et D. Bonavent. in speculo, loco cit. Tanner. disp. 5. quaest. 8. dubio 2.
This sin is opposed to Religion, and mortal in kind.
Peccatum hoc est Religioni oppositum, et ex genere mortale.
It is proved by the Saintly Doctor first. Because to sell things of which we do not have dominion is injustice; but the Simoniac sells spiritual things, of which he has not dominion, but only administration, as it is said in 1 Cor. 4.: So let a man esteem us as the ministers of Christ, and the dispensers of the Mysteries of God. Therefore Matth. 10. commands: Freely have you received, freely give.
Probatur a S. Doctore primo. Quia vendere ea, quorum non habemus dominium, est iniustitia; sed Simoniacus vendit spiritualia, quorum non habet dominium, sed tantum administrationem, ut prima Cor. 4. dicitur: Sic nos existimet homo, ut ministros Christi, et dispensatores Mysteriorum Dei. Ideo Matth. 10. praecipit: Gratis accepistis, gratis date.
Next it is proved by the Saintly Doctor in 4. dub. cit. from 4. Reg. 5. and the Acts 8. where Simon and Giezi are condemned; and in the Council of Chalcedon cap. 2. and extra de Simonia, 1. quaest. 1. as S. Bonaventure notes in 4. dist. 25. quaest. 4.
Deinde probatur a S. Doctore in 4. dub. cit. ex 4. Reg. 5. et Actorum 8. ubi damnatur in Simone, et Giezi; et in Concilio Chalcedonensi cap. 2. et extra de Simonia, 1. quaest. 1. ut notat S. Bonavent. in 4. dist. 25. quaest. 4.
It is proved thirdly by D. Bonaventure ibidem: Everyone who esteems the inestimable gift of God as to be possessed for money, sins gravely: but the Simoniac so esteems it: Therefore. It is the Argument of D. Peter Act. 8. and he adds, that this man often errs in faith, because he believes grace not to be grace.
Probatur tertio a D. Bonavent. ibidem: Omnis aestimans, inaestimabile donum Dei pecunia possideri, peccat graviter: Simoniacus autem sic aestimat: Ergo. Est Argumentum D. Petri Act. 8. et addit, hunc saepe errare in fide, quia gratiam credit non esse gratiam.
Hence he argues. No greater perversion exists than to treat one contrary as if the other contrary, but the Simoniac treats the spiritual things of God as his own vendibles, and corporeal things: Therefore.
Hinc arguit. Nulla maior est perversio, quam contrarium tractare, quasi alterum contrarium, sed Simoniacus tractat spiritualia Dei, ut sua vendibilia, et corporalia: Ergo.
It is proved fourthly by the Saintly Doctor: As wisdom is attributed to the Son; So goodness to the Holy Spirit; but he who attributed folly to the Son would err gravely: Therefore also he who ascribes avarice to the Holy Spirit; but thus esteems the Simoniac, treating the Holy Spirit, who is the gift liberal of love from the origin, as if through avarice He should sell his gifts, as Blessed Peter said Act. 8. Therefore.
Probatur quarto a S. Doctore: Sicuti filio attribuitur sapientia; Ita Spiritui Sancto bonitas; sed qui filio attribueret insipientiam, graviter erraret: Ergo et qui tribuit Spiritui Sancto avaritiam; sed taliter aestimat Simoniacus tractans Spiritum Sanctum, qui est donum ab origine liberale amoris, quasi avaritia vendat dona sua, ut dixit B. Petrus Act. 8. Ergo.
It is proved fifthly by the Saintly Doctor in the body, from Micheas 3. where the Lord gravely reproves this vice, saying: Her princes judged for gifts, and her priests taught for hire, and her Prophets divined for money. For this cause, for thy sake, Sion shall be plowed as a field.
Probatur quinto a S. Doctore in corpore, ex Micheae 3. ubi graviter Dominus reprehendit hoc vitium, dicens: Principes eius in muneribus iudicabant, et sacerdotes eius in mercede docebant, et Prophetae eius in pecunia diuinabant. Propter hoc, causa vestri, Sion quasi ager arabitur.
It is placed in the genus of Sacrilege by Azorius lib. 9. c. 17. quaesito 8. and Tanner. dub. 2. although others distinguish it also from Sacrilege, Cajetanus q. 99. art. 1. Valencia quaest. 16. puncto 4. with D. Bonaventure loc. cit. of the Centiloquium.
Ponitur autem in genere Sacrilegii ab Azorio lib. 9. c. 17. quaesito 8. et Tanner. dub. 2. etsi alii etiam a Sacrilegio utrumque distinguant, Caietanus q. 99. art. 1. Valentia quaest. 16. puncto 4. cum D. Bonavent. loco cit. Centiloquii.
It is, however, a single sin, as the Saintly Doctor says in the body, although infidelity can be joined with it, believing the gifts of God vendible, and that a temporal price suits the spiritual thing, which exceeds every price, and the price of the grace of God.
Est autem unicum peccatum, ut ait S. Doctor in corpore, etsi cum eo coniungi possit infidelitas credens, dona Dei vendibilia, et rei spirituali, quae omne pretium excedit, et gratiae Dei pretium convenire temporale.
It is called by D. Bonaventure loc. cit. of the Mirror, an injustice against God, insofar as that which is above every temporal price is sold against the Divine will. In which he does not seem to place Simony as a proper Injustice; for these things always remain under the free dominion of God, and just as to squander the grace of God is not a special injustice, so also to sell it, as Tanner. noted num. 25. although Sotus lib. 9. de Iust. quaest. 5. art. 1. and Valencia loco cit. esteem it a special injustice.
Vocatur autem a D. Bonavent. loco cit. speculi, iniustitia contra Deum, quatenus id, quod est supra omne pretium temporale, contra Divinam voluntatem venditur. In quo non videtur ponere Simoniam Iniustitiam propriam; manent enim haec semper sub Dei libero dominio, et sicuti gratiam Dei prodigere, non est specialis iniustitia, ita et vendere, ut notavit Tanner. num. 25. etsi iniustitiam specialem aestiment eam Sotus lib. 9. de Iust. quaest. 5. art. 1. et Valentia loco cit.
He objects to himself first, for Saul, and Jeroboam wished to offer a price to the prophets for the gift of prophecy.
Aliqua sibi obiicit primo, nam Saul, et Hieroboam pretium exhibere voluerunt prophetis ob prophetiae donum.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that he never read that those prophets received anything; but they offered ignorantly, as they were wont to offer even to soothsayers.
Respondet S. Doctor, non legi unquam prophetas illos aliquid recepisse; sed illi ignoranter exhibebant, ut solebant exhibere etiam ariolis.
He objects secondly: The Apostle argues, 1 Corinth. 9.: If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great matter if we reap your carnal things?
Obiicit secundo: Apostolus prima Corinth. 9. arguit: Si nos vobis spiritualia seminavimus, magnum est, si carnalia vestra metamus.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that to give spiritual things, for the end of receiving temporal things, is Simony: Yet to give spiritual things, and to receive sustenance for labors in spiritual things, is not Simony; and as a Physician, or Advocate can receive a fee for his labor; So also the one celebrating Mass.
Respondet S. Doctor, dare spiritualia, ob finem recipiendi temporalia, esse Simoniam: Attamen dare spiritualia, et recipere sustentationem ad labores in spiritualibus, non esse Simoniam; sicuti autem Medicus, aut Advocatus ob laborem potest recipere mercedem; Ita etiam et celebrans Missam.
He objects thirdly. The kingdom of heaven, which is most spiritual, is bought.
Obiicit tertio. Regnum caelorum, quod est spiritualissimum, emitur.
It is answered that it is bought by acts of the virtues, but not by money.
Respondetur illud emi actibus virtutum, non autem pecunia.
He objects fourthly: He who gives temporal things, that he may receive spiritual things, esteems them more: this therefore is not disordered.
Obiicit quarto: Qui dat temporalia, ut recipiat spiritualia, plus ea aestimat: hoc ergo non deordinatur.
The Saintly Doctor answers, that it is disordered, while the inestimable is esteemed for money.
Respondet S. Doctor, inordinari, dum inaestimabile pecunia aestimatur.
First. Simony is divided into three genera, Mental, Conventional, and Real: the Mental is that which is expressed by no outward sign, but is conceived by the mind alone, lest the deed follow; but if the exchange of a spiritual thing is made with a perverse mind, it is no longer purely mental.
Primo. Simonia in tria genera dividitur, Mentalem, Conventionalem, et Realem: Mentalis est, quae nullo signo extra exprimitur, sed mente sola concipitur, ne sequatur opus; quod si mente perversa fiat commutatio rei spiritualis, iam non est amplius pure mentalis.
The Conventional is that which is already expressed by words, or signs, but is not yet in fact commanded to execution, whether on neither side, or on one; either because one gives only a temporal thing, while the other only promises the spiritual; or conversely, because one gives the spiritual, the other promises the temporal, as Navarr. teaches cap. 23. num. 103. Valencia num. 5. Tanner. n. 28. Zuadius, Sotus de Iustitia lib. 9. quaest. 8. art. 1. and Cajetanus quaest. 100. art. 6. say, that in the latter sense it is a real Simony.
Conventionalis est, quae verbis iam, vel signis exprimitur, sed nec re ipsa est adhuc executioni mandata, sive ex neutra parte, sive ex altera; vel quia alter dat tantum temporale; alter vero spirituale solum promittit; vel e contra, quia alter dat spirituale, alter temporale promittit, ut docent Navar. cap. 23. num. 103. Valentia num. 5. Tanner. n. 28. Zuadius, Sotus de Iustitia lib. 9. quaest. 8. art. 1. et Caietanus quaest. 100. art. 6. dicant, in posteriori sensu esse Simoniam realem.
Real Simony is when that perverse will is expressed, and commanded to execution in fact.
Realis Simonia est, quando perversa illa voluntas exprimitur, et executioni re ipsa mandatur.
Next it is divided by D. Bonaventure in 4. dist. 25. dub. 6. litt. and in other places cited, and other TT. into that which is prohibited by natural, and Divine law; and into that prohibited by merely positive human law, whether as the things are temporal, which are sometimes exchangeable, or as both sides are spiritual, as happens when benefices are illicitly exchanged, which nevertheless is not properly Simony.
Deinde dividitur a D. Bonavent. in 4. dist. 25. dub. 6. litt. et aliis locis citatis, et aliis TT. in eam, quae iure naturali, et Divino prohibita est; et in prohibitam solo iure positivo humano, sive qua res sint temporales, quae aliquando sunt permutabiles, sive qua utrinque sint spirituales, ut accidit, dum beneficia illicite permutantur, quae tamen non est proprie Simonia.
Thirdly it is divided into the True, and the Presumptive in the external forum.
Tertio dividitur in Veram, et Praesumptam in foro exteriori.