Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question XXI: Whether a man ought to love himself out of charity
I ASSERT that the love of oneself is also included in the precept of Charity.
An homo debeat seipsum ex CHARITATE diligere.
ASSERO, Charitatis praecepto includi etiam sui dilectionem.
It is PROVED by the Saintly Doctors; for in the precept of the love of neighbor it is said: thou shalt love him as thyself; but we love our neighbor out of Charity: therefore by the same Charity also ourselves, as St. Aug. observes serm. 3. post Pentecost. and the Saintly Doct. dist. 28. q. 6. ad 2.
PROBATUR a SS. Doctoribus; nam in praecepto dilectionis proximi habetur: diliges eum, sicut te ipsum; sed proximum ex Charitate diligimus: ergo eadem Charitate etiam nos ipsos, ut observat etiam D. Aug. serm. 3. post Pentecost. et S. Doct. dist. 28. q. 6. ad 2.
It is PROVED second by the Saintly Doctor, because to love God with the whole heart, with the whole soul, and with the whole mind is to love oneself. Therefore it is said Lucae 10. after the precepts of Charity have been handed down: Do this, and thou shalt live.
PROBATUR secundo a S. Doctore, quia diligere Deum ex toto corde, ex tota anima, et ex tota mente, est seipsum diligere. Ideo dicitur Lucae 10. post tradita praecepta Charitatis: Hoc fac, et vives.
That a special precept need not have been handed down, the Saintly Doctor admonishes, because from natural inclination we are sufficiently inclined toward ourselves: For no man ever hated his own flesh. Ephes. 5. Therefore a third commandment was not necessary, as St. Augustine says Lib. 1. de doctrina Christiana, cap. 24.
Non oportuisse autem speciale praeceptum tradere admonet S. Doctor, quia ex naturali propensione satis ad nos inclinamur: Nemo enim unquam carnem suam odio habuit. Ephes. 5. Ideo non oportuit tertium mandatum, ut ait D. Augustinus Lib. 1. de doctrina Christiana, cap. 24.
Yet the Saintly Doctor NOTES, dist. 28. quest. 5. in the body, and quest. 6. there, that since Charity, properly speaking, is friendship, we can speak of Charity in a twofold way: in one way under the common aspect of friendship; and in this sense friendship toward oneself is not had, because friendship implies the union of several, as D. Dionysius says cap. 4. de divin. nominibus, part. 2.; but toward oneself for each one there is unity, which is more powerful than union with another. Therefore with a more sublime love than friendship we love ourselves; for as unity is the principle of union, so the love by which one loves himself is the form and root of friendship. For we have friendship toward others in this, that we bear ourselves toward them as toward ourselves; for it is said in 9. Eth. cap. 8. that the things of friendship which are toward another come from those which are toward oneself. In another way we can speak of Charity as it is the friendship of man with God principally,1 and in consequence toward the things that are God's, among which is also man himself, who has Charity; and thus among the other things that he loves out of Charity, as pertaining to God, he loves also himself out of Charity. Thus Tannerus also discusses it disp. 2. quest. 3. dub. 1. 1 Editor's note: the print reads 'de Charitate, pto vt est amicitia' — a defective letterform (apparently broken 'r' in 'pro'); rendered 'prout est' (insofar as it is).
ADVERTIT vero S. Doctor, dist. 28. quaest. 5. in corpore, et quaest. 6. ibidem, quod cum Charitas, proprie dicta, sit amicitia; dupliciter possumus loqui de Charitate; uno modo sub ratione communi amicitiae; et hoc sensu non habetur amicitia ad seipsum, quia amicitia dicit unionem plurium, ut ait D. Dionysius cap. 4. de divin. nominibus, part. 2. unicuique autem ad seipsum est unitas, quae est potior unione cum alio. Igitur amore sublimiori, quam amicitia, diligimus nos ipsos; sicut enim unitas est principium unionis; ita amor, quo quis diligit se ipsum, est forma, et radix amicitiae. In hoc enim amicitiam habemus ad alios, quod ad eos nos habemus, sicut ad nos ipsos; dicitur enim in 9. Eth. cap. 8. quod amicabilia, quae sunt ad alterum, veniunt ex his, quae sunt ad seipsum. Alio modo possumus loqui de Charitate, prout est amicitia hominis cum Deo principaliter, et ex consequenti ad ea, quae sunt Dei, inter quae etiam est ipse homo, qui Charitatem habet; et sic inter caetera, quae ex Charitate diligit, quasi ad Deum pertinentia, etiam se ipsum ex Charitate diligit. Sic discutit etiam Tannerus disp. 2. quaest. 3. dub. 1.
From these understand what St. Gregory means homil. 27. in Evang. that Charity cannot be had as less than between two; whence he infers that Charity is not had toward oneself; clearly in the reason of friendship, as the Saintly Doctors expound it.
Ex quibus intellige, quid velit D. Gregorius homil. 27. in Evang. quod Charitas minus quam inter duos haberi non potest; unde infert, ad seipsum non haberi Charitatem; in ratione sane amicitiae, ut exponunt Sancti Doctores.