Doubt — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica

Doubt VI: Whether canons who talk in choir can receive the distributions

English · Latin · Both

1.

Many deny it, as reported by Diana resol. 7.

2.

Others, however, concede that they can receive distributions.

3.

To me the former opinion is proved, for by cap. Dolentes they are most gravely condemned: Therefore they do not satisfy.

4.

Moreover it is certain that those absent from Choir cannot receive distributions, and if they received them, they would be bound to restitution; but it is all the same, as regards the end of the precept, which must be looked at above all, whether the Canons are absent, or present while confabulating; nay, at times they would profit the Choir more by wholly abstaining from it than by mumbling and whispering and diverting the pious application of others: These things, however, are to be limited according to what we said above dubit. 3., considering whether that confabulation is slight or great; holy or profane, etc. For these conditions, inasmuch as they validate or invalidate the recitation of the office, also make the Canon capable or incapable of distributions.

5.

There are, however, some Canons who are bound only to assist in Choir, without any burden of reciting; and these Bassaeus excepts num. 24., if they confabulate so modestly and humbly that they are not a scandal to others; which happens when they converse with one another somewhat farther off and apart from the rest. Of these I have given some indication tom. 4. tract. 1. de actibus humanis, disp. 17. quaest. 10., according to the tenor of proposition 19 condemned by Alexander VII.