Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question VII: Whether hope is at times formless
English · Latin · BothHide topicsShow topics
I assert most certainly that Hope is at times unformed.
Certissime assero, Spem aliquando esse informem.
It is proved first by St. Bonaventure from St. Augustine de vera Innocentia, where he attributes being unformed to Charity alone.
Probatur a D. Bonav. primo ex D. August. de vera Innocentia, ubi soli Charitati tribuit, esse tantum informem.
Second, because just as formed Hope arises from formed faith; so unformed Hope ought to arise from unformed faith: But unformed faith is granted, as is said 1 Corinth. 13. Therefore.
Secundo, quia sicuti Spes formata oritur e fide formata; ita Spes informis a fide informi debet oriri: Sed datur fides informis, ut dicitur prima Corinth. 13. Ergo.
Third. For thus Hope arises from faith in rewards, just as fear from faith in punishments: But fear can be unformed: Therefore.
Tertio. Sic enim Spes consurgit ex fide praemiorum, sicuti timor ex fide suppliciorum: Sed timor potest esse informis: Ergo.
Fourth. For many sinners hope that they will obtain mercy and glory; But this act ought to arise from some good habit, because it rectifies the power to the Divine rule, which most of all forbids despairing of the mercy of God. For thus also faith strengthens reason to believe the things revealed, even when stained by deadly sin. And the Holy Doctor concludes that those things which were said of unformed faith are to be applied to Hope.
Quarto. Multi enim peccatores sperant, se misericordiam consecuturos, et gloriam; Iste autem actus ab aliquo habitu bono oriri debet, quia rectificat potentiam ad Divinam regulam, quae maxime prohibet desperare de misericordia Dei. Sic enim et fides roborat rationem ad credendum revelata, etiam in peccato maculati mortifero. Concludit autem S. D. ea, quae dicta sunt de fide informi, applicari Spei.
You will object first. Hope is a certain expectation of glory proceeding from grace and merits; as is said in the definition of Hope.
Obiicies primo. Spes est certa expectatio gloriae prouentiens ex gratia, et meritis; ut dicitur in definitione Spei.
The Holy Doctor answers in four ways that hope arises from grace and merits; Either as they are had in act, and this is the formed faith of the iusti emeriti: Or as they are had in proposal, and in root; but not in effect, and thus he who was lately justified has merits, has the root of grace, but has not yet exercised the virtues: Or someone hopes from merits in proposal; but not in effect, nor in the root of grace; and this is unformed faith: Or one hopes without merits even in proposal; and this is presumption. Since therefore Hope is defined expectation from merits, it is defined from merits, at least in proposal.
Respondet S Doct: quatuor modis spem ex gratia, et meritis oriri; Vel ut habentur actu, et haec est fides formata iusti emeriti: Vel ut habentur in proposito, et in radice; sed non in effectu, et sic ille, habet merita, qui nuper iustificatus, habet radicem gratiae, sed nondum exercuit virtutes: Vel aliquis sperat ex meritis in proposito; sed non in effectu, nec in radice gratiae; et haec est fides informis: Vel sperat sine meritis etiam in proposito; et haec est praesumptio. Cum igitur definitur Spes expectatio ex meritis, definitur ex meritis, saltem in proposito.
And by this he answers the second, opposing that Hope without merits is evil.
Et per haec respondet ad secundum, opponens, Spem sine meritis esse malam.
You will object second. With the proximate subject disordered, the virtue existing in it is taken away; but Hope is in the affect; therefore, this being disordered, Hope is taken away together with charity, which, if faith remains, this is because it has being also in the intellect.
Obiicies secundo. Deordinato subiecto proximo, tollitur virtus in eo existens; at Spes est in affectu; ergo, hoc deordinato, tollitur Spes simul cum charitate, quod si manet fides, hoc est, quia habet esse etiam in intellectu.
The Holy Doctor answers that Hope remains even when Charity is destroyed, because it stands in awaiting eternal things; but this stands without Charity; just as it stands to believe the things revealed without sanctifying grace. Therefore the ratio of the subject is not adequate, because the affect disordered in loving can be with some order to hoping from merits, certainly in proposal.
Respondet S. Doct. quod Spes manet etiam destructa Charitate, quia stat in expectandis aeternis; hoc autem stat sine Charitate; sicut stat credere revelata absque gratia sanctificante. Ideo ratio subiecti non est adaequata, quia affectus deordinatus in amando potest esse cum aliquo ordine ad sperandum ex meritis sane in proposito.
You will object lastly. Faith is then formed, when it does not believe God, but believes in God, tending to him: Therefore Hope, which tends to God, is always formed.
Obiicies ultimo. Fides tunc est formata, quando non credit Deo, sed credit in Deum, tendens in illum: Ergo Spes, quae tendit in Deum, semper est formata.
The Holy Doctor answers that the perfect tendency is from grace; but this tendency is not in him who believes and hopes, while he is in sin.
Respondet Respondet S. Doct. tendentiam perfectam esse a gratia, haec autem tendentia non est in eo, qui credit, et sperat, dum est in peccato.