Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question VI: Whether religion is necessary
FROM the Etymologies of Religion (q. 1.) it is sufficiently drawn out that the worship of Religion is necessary.
E Religionis Ethymologiis q. 1. sufficienter elicitur, Religionis cultum necessarium esse.
It is however further confirmed by arguments. The first is that of D. Bonaventure, 3 dist. 9, art. 2, q. 1: Since God created man a MICROCOSM, placing in him the perfections of the whole world, and having gifted him with the orb as a pilgrim, prepared Paradise; it was altogether fitting that, acknowledging his God, he should worship and venerate Him, and bearing all things acceptable to Him, pay tribute; and indeed justice constrained him.
Amplius tamen argumentis firmatur. Primum est D. Bonavent. 3. dist. 9. art. 2. quaest. 1. Cum enim Deus hominem condiderit MICROCOSMON, in eo reponens mundi totius perfectiones, ac orbem peregrino donaverit, Paradisum paraverit; aequum omnino fuit, ut suum Deum agnoscens coleret, veneraretur, et omnia ei ferens accepta, tributum exolveret, et sane iustitia eum devinciebat.
It is the argument of Tully de Inventione, Macrobius, book 1, In Somnium Scipionis, chapter 8, who for that reason placed Religion among the parts of moral justice; so also D. Augustine in the book de vera Religione, D. Thomas, q. 81, art. 1 and 2, and other Fathers and Theologians, who define Religion: It is the virtue rendering to God the worship due to Him, as to the first principle of things and the last end. Boverius adds, Demonstration of the first Symbol, article 1, that man was created for this, that he might render the services of servitude to his Lord, as D. Augustine collects in Psalm 70, concio 2, and book 8 de Genesi ad litteram, chapter 6, and from the precept given to Adam; and I showed it, p. 1, tract. 10; and the Saintly Doctor shows it, on Luke 17, in the parable of the servant who, when he has fulfilled all the commands of his Lord and rendered Him all services, is not acknowledged with acts of thanks.
Est argumentum Tullii de Inventione, Macrob. lib. 1. in somn. scip. cap. 8. qui ideo Religionem inter moralis iustitiae partes collocarunt; sic et D. August. lib. de vera Relig. D. Thom. quaest. 81. art. 1. 2. et alii Patres, ac Theologi, qui definiunt Religionem: Est virtus, Deo reddens cultum debitum, tanquam primo rerum principio, et ultimo fini. Addit Bouerius demonstr. primi Symb. art. 1. ad hoc hominem conditum, ut servitutis obsequia suo Domino praestaret, ut colligit D. August. in Psalm. 70. conc. 2. et lib. 8. de Genesi ad litt. cap. 6. E praecepto dato Adae, et ostendi p. 1. tract. 10. et ostendit S. Doctor ad 17. Lucae, parabola servi, qui omnia cum adimpleverit Domini iussa, eique obsequia cuncta praestiterit, non est gratiis actis recognitus.
The second argument of D. Bonaventure, at the place cited, is: since all are held to confess that there is a Monarchy in the world, governing and directing all things, who would not confess it laudable and commanded to obey so great a Lord? Who would deny Him services and adorations? Or would not pray in necessities? Would not beseech Him to be propitious? etc.
Secunda ratio D. Bonavent. loco citato, est, cum enim in mundo fateri omnes teneantur esse Monarchiam, omnia regentem, atque dirigentem: quis tanto Domino obsequi non fateatur laudabile, atque praeceptum? quis obsequia, adorationes ei denegabit? aut non exorabit in necessitatibus? non deprecabitur propitium? etc.
The third argument of D. Bonaventure, at the place cited, is: Since man is created for the blessed life, as all Philosophers and Theologians unanimously agree; and since that life is to be acquired by the merits of the virtues — which even the Pagans felt — by having recourse to grace with God toward keeping the end, rendering services to the fountain and Lord of beatitude: who does not see that the acts of Religious service are to be assumed? Thus argues Asclepius, last chapter; Plato in the Epinomis; Aristotle, book de Republica; Alexander of Aphrodisias de Providentia; Hierocles Against the Atheists, chapter 1; Iamblichus de Mysteriis Aegyptiorum, chapter 45; Tully, book 1 de Legibus. Why do I recount outsiders? This is what the Christian Religion professes, what the oracles of the sacred letters decree, what the Gospel preaching everywhere scatters abroad: that salvation is established in the true worship of God. Boethius also urges this at the place cited.
Tertia ratio D. Bonavent. loco citato, est; Cum enim homo ad beatam vitam sit conditus, ut omnes Philosophi, et Theologi consentiunt unanimes; ea autem sit meritis acquirenda virtutum, quod etiam Pagani sensere, gratiam apud Deum initam ad finem servando, obsequia beatitatis fonti, et Domino exhibendo; quis actus Religiosi obsequii non videt assumendos? Sic arguit Asclepius cap. ultim. Plato in Epinomede, Aristoteles, lib. de Republic. Alexander Aphrodisens de providentia, Hierocles contra Atheistas, cap. 1. Iamblicus de Mysteriis AEgyp. cap. 45. Tullius primo, de leg. Quid recenseo alienos? Hoc est, quod Christiana Religio profitetur, quod sacrarum oracula litterarum decernunt, quod Evangelica ubique praedicatio disseminat, in vero Dei cultu salutem esse constitutam. Haec urget etiam Boetius loco cit.