Doubt — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Doubt II: Whether the baptism of infants can be supplied by martyrdom
The NEGATIVE opinion is attributed to Alexander of Hales 4. part. quaest. 22. memb. 5. art. 1. Adrian in 4. quaest. ult. de Baptismo, Armachanus lib. 8. de qq. Armen. cap. 37. D. Bonaventure in 4. dist. 4. part. 2. art. 1. quaest. 2. — where however he did not teach it, nor can this opinion be found in his writings, as Suarez disp. 29. sect. 1. Vasquez disp. 153. cap. 7. Mastrius disp. 2. quaest. 7. art. 4. and other recent authors cited by him testify.
SENTENTIA negativa adscribitur Alensi 4. part. quaest. 22. memb. 5. art. 1. Adriano in 4. quaest. ult. de Baptismo, Armacano lib. 8. de qq. Armen. cap. 37. D. Bonaventurae in 4. dist. 4. part. 2. art. 1. quaest. 2. ubi tamen id non docuit, nec in eius scriptis haec sententia reperiri potest, ut testantur Suarez disp. 29. sect. 1. Vasquez disp. 153. cap. 7. Mastrius disp. 2. quaest. 7. art. 4. et alii recentes apud illum.
The SECOND opinion, the assertive one, is that of D. Thomas 2. 2. quaest. 114. art. 1. ad 1. et quodl. 6. art. 4. Richard in 4. dist. 4. art. 2. quaest. 3. Scotus dist. 4. quaest. 3., whom the others commonly imitate, as in Mastrius loc. cit. Soto disp. 3. art. 11. Suarez, and Vasquez above. This is the opinion of D. Bonaventure dist. 4. part. 2. art. 1. quaest. 2., where he limits the opinion of Alexander of Hales, who said that Baptism of water profits more persons than that of blood. Whence he makes no distinction here between infants and adults, as Suarez notes.
SECUNDA sententia assertiva est D. Thom. 2. 2. quaest. 114. art. 1. ad 1. et quodl. 6. art. 4. Rich. in 4. dist. 4. art. 2. quaest. 3. Scotus dist. 4. quaest. 3. quem communiter imitantur alii apud Mastrium loc. cit. Soto disp. 3. art. 11. Suarez, et Vasquez supra. Haec est sententia D. Bonavent. dist. 4. part. 2. art. 1. quaest. 2. ubi limitat sententiam Alensis, dicentis, Baptismum aquae pluribus prodesse, quam sanguinis. Unde nihil in hoc distinguit inter parvulos, et adultos, ut notat Suarez.
MORE CLEARLY, in the fourth part of that distinction, dub. 4. cit., where he confesses that the Holy Innocents are Martyrs by privilege. And in dubio 4. he asserts that an infant who, while being carried to Baptism, is killed so as not to be baptized, and dies for Baptism, is rightly and piously believed baptized in his blood: what could be clearer?
CLARIUS ea quarta distinctionis parte, dub. 4. cit. ubi SS. Innocentes esse ex privilegio Martyres fatetur. Et dubio 4. asserit, infantem, qui, dum portatur ad Baptismum, occiditur, ne baptizetur, et moritur pro Baptismo, recte in sanguine suo pie credi baptizatum: quid clarius?
THE Innocents indeed the Church venerates as Martyrs, and the Holy Fathers confess it: Augustine lib. 3. de lib. arb. cap. 23. et lib. 2. de Symbolo ad Catech. cap. 5. et lib. 3. cap. 4. Cyprian serm. de Stella, et Magis. Leo Pope serm. de Epiph. primo, et secundo. Origen homil. 3. in varia Evang. loca. And the Church prays for them in its prayer as Martyrs.
Innocentes sane, ut Martyres, veneratur Ecclesia, et Sancti Patres fatentur, Augustinus lib. 3. de lib. arb. cap. 23. et lib. 2. de Symbolo ad Catech. cap. 5. et lib. 3. cap. 4. Cyprianus serm. de Stella, et Magis. Leo Pap. serm. de Epiph. primo, et secundo. Origenes homil. 3. in varia Evang. loca. Ecclesia vero eos in oratione, ut Martyres, exorat.
S. Bonaventure adds, dub. 1., that the liberty of will was wanting to them, and therefore their Martyrdom was not so perfect as in holy adults; for to perfection charity is required, moving the will, as is said Ioan. 15. Wherefore, when Mastrius infers: If contrition were necessary, it would follow that in infants the Martyrdom is imperfect, according to the Fathers — which is readily granted to him: Nay, I retort: If the reason is equal, therefore no disposition of will is required in adults.
Addit S. Bonav. dub. 1. defecisse eis voluntatis libertatem, ideo non ita perfectum Martyrium fuisse, sicuti in sanctis adultis; ad perfectionem enim requiritur charitas movens voluntatem, ut dicitur Ioan. 15. Quare dum Mastrius infert: Si esset necessaria contritio, sequeretur in parvulis imperfectum esse, iuxta Patres, Martyrium, quod ipsi libenter conceditur: Imo retorqueo: Si est aequalis ratio: Ergo nulla voluntatis dispositio exigitur in adultis.