Doubt — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Doubt II: Whether the gift of understanding can coexist with faith
I ASSERT. It is proved from St. Thomas here, and St. Bonaventure de 7. donis, cap. 7. by that of Luke at the end: He opened their sense, that they might understand the Scriptures. I shall prove the same in the following doubt.
Utrum DONUM INTELLECTUS possit esse simul cum FIDE.
ASSERO. Probatur a D. Thoma hic, et D. Bonav. de 7. donis, cap. 7. illo Lucae ultimo: Aperuit illis sensum, ut intelligerent Scripturas. Idem probabo, dubio sequenti.
It is PROVED from St. Bonaventure loc. cit. by the discourse of the Lincolnian upon the beginning of the Mystical Theology, which he uses as St. Thomas does, because the gift of Understanding raises [the mind] to the senses of the Scriptures, and the understanding of the Mysteries, in a manner proportioned to the way; yet where God does not seem to be [seen] without Symbols, even in the anagogic senses, not to mention the literal, allegorical, and moral; for he still enters with Moses into the cloud, as is said Exodus 24.
PROBATUR a S. Bonav. loc. cit. discursu Linconiensis super principium Mysticae Theologiae, quo uti ur D. Thom. quia donum Intellectus erigit ad sensus Scripturarum, et intelligentiam Mysteriorum, modo proportionato viae; ubi tamen non videtur Deus sine Symbolis, etiam in sensibus anagogicis, ne dum litteralibus allegoricis, et moralibus; intrat enim adhuc cum Moyse caliginem, ut dicitur Exodi 24.
THEN he proves it, because this gift raises the mind as much as is necessary for merit; Therefore it is said Luke 10. Moreover one thing is necessary; and accordingly, as much as it does not detract from faith in the way, it raises the mind, as necessary for the ordinary mode of merit.
DEINDE id probat, quia elevat hoc donum mentem, quantum necessarium ad meritum; Ideo dicitur Lucae 10. Porro unum est necessarium; atque adeo, quantum non detrahit fidei in via, necessatiae ad modum meriti ordinarium, mentem erigit.
Which doctrine of St. Thomas solves the objections of those striving [to prove] that the gift of understanding, as clearly showing the object of faith, is repugnant to be shown.
QUAE doctrina S. Thom. solvit obiecta conantis, donum intellectus, tanquam clare ostendens obiectum fidei, repugnans ostendere.