Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question I: Whether the state of regular prelacy is necessary in a religious order
It must be noted beforehand that a twofold power can be considered in Praelates: one is of Dominion: the other is of Jurisdiction: the former arises from the power of commanding, wherefore it can exist in the Father of a family with respect to his household, as also in a master with respect to his servant: the latter is born of the reception of that Order which Jurisdiction can follow from the declaration of a superior.
PRaenotandum est, duplicem considerari potestatem in Praelatis: Altera est Dominii: Altera est Iurisdictionis: illa oritur a virtute praecipiendi, quare in Patrefamilias potest esse respectu Domesticorum, sicut et in domino respectu servi: haec vero nascitur e susceptione talis Ordinis, quem potest Iurisdictio ex superioris declaratione consequi.
Rursus a Praelatus is taken either broadly, insofar as he presides over some in spiritual things, in which sense the Parish priest is said to preside over those entrusted to his care; or properly, for him who has Jurisdiction in the contentious forum, in which sense Praelatus is now commonly understood.
Rursus Praelatus sumitur vel late, quatenus aliquibus in spiritualibus praeest, quo sensu dicitur Parochus praeesse his, qui ipsius curae demandantur; vel proprie, pro illo qui habet Iurisdictionem in foro contentioso, quo sensu nunc communiter Praelatus intelligitur.
ASSERO, supposing the institution of the regular life, that some pre-eminence in it is simply necessary, so all hold commonly with Suarez, to be cited below.
ASSERO, supposita institutione vitae regularis, simpliciter necessariam esse in ea praelaturam aliquam, ita omnes communiter apud Suarez, infra citandum.
PROBATUR by the holy Doctor, loco citato. The institution of the regular life is of beginners tending toward the advance of perfection; but such have need of having a superior, at whose nod they may avoid what is harmful, pursue what is useful, be taught what they are ignorant of, etc., as D. Paul says, Hebr. 5. you have need that you be taught, what are the elements of the beginning of the words of the Lord.
PROBATUR a S. Doctore loco citato. Institutio vitae regularis est incipientium ad perfectionis profectum tendere; sed tales indigent habere superiorem, ad cuius nutum noxia devitent, utilia sectentur, quae ignorant doceantur, etc. ut ait D. Paulus Hebr. 5. indigetis ut vos doceamini, quae sunt elementa exordii sermonum Domini.
PROBATUR secondly in the same place by the holy Doctor: that some are imperfect, who customarily run the more sluggishly in the stadium of virtues, and have need of someone by whom they are not only allured by examples, but also compelled by precepts to the exercise of virtue; which cannot be done without the power of Praelation; but men very imperfect, affected only with the desire of profiting, are wont to enter Religion from the world; and these are detained from sins at the beginning more by human fear than by the divine precept.
PROBATUR secundo ibidem, a S. Doctore; quod aliqui sunt imperfectiones, eo pigrius solent in virtutum stadio currere, indigentque aliquo, a quo non solum exemplis alliciantur, verum et praeceptis compellantur ad virtutis exercitium; quod fieri nequit absque potestate Praelationis; sed solent e mundo in Religionem ingredi viri valde imperfecti, solo affecti desiderio proficiendi; hi vero magis ab initio, humano timore, quam divino praecepto a peccatis detinentur.
PROBATUR thirdly by the Seraphic Doctor. In every well-ordered government it is necessary that there be someone to correct vices and defects; for, as the holy Doctor observes here, sin is like a fever, or a wound, which unless the skill of physicians forestalls them, pass into a worse state; nor can he who falls into fault of himself rise again, unless he is supported by a stronger and corrected; for fault leaves behind it a certain languor, over which it is necessary that power be obtained; wherefore it is said, Luke 9. he gave them virtue and power, that they might cure languors; but the languor of the infirm man is cured by humbly obeying the command of the physician, as the Seraphic Doctor concludes there; but the physician, unless he be in the same house with the infirm man, can allow him to perish before he knows that he is infirm.
PROBATUR tertio a Seraphico. In omni regimine bene ordinato necesse est ut sit aliquis qui vitia, et defectus corrigat; nam ut hic observat S. Doctor, peccatum est ad instar febris, vel vulneris, quae si medicorum solertia non praecaveantur, in deterius abeunt; nec, qui labitur in culpam, per se potens est resurgere, nisi a fortiori fulciatur, et corripiatur; relinquit enim post se culpa languorem quemdam, super quem necesse est, ut potestas obtineatur; quare dicitur Lucae 9. dedit illis virtutem, et potestatem, ut languores curarent, curatur autem languor infirmi, humiliter obtemperando praecepto medici, ut ibi concludit Seraphicus Doctor; medicus autem nisi sit in eadem domo cum infirmo, potest permittere, ut pereat, antequam ipsum infirmum esse cognoscat.
PROBATUR finally by Suarez tomo 4. de Relig. lib. 2. cap. 1. There being one correlative, it is necessary that the other exist: but Praelation and obedience in the regular life are two correlatives; the latter exists necessarily in it; therefore also the former.
PROBATUR denique a Suarez tomo 4. de Relig. lib. 2. cap. 1. Exsistente uno correlativo, necesse est ut existat aliud: sed Praelatio, et obedientia in vita regulari sunt duo correlativa; haec autem in ea necessario existit; ergo et illa.
From these you have that this power ought to be not only directive, but also coercive; for the former without the latter is for the most part useless, since it cannot be given over to execution.
Ex his habes potestatem hanc debere non solum esse directivam, sed etiam coactivam; illa enim sine hac plerumque inutilis est; cum nequeat executioni mancipari.
HABES secondly, that it need not necessarily, but befits it, to be a power of jurisdiction; for although everyone is contained sufficiently in religious observance by the dominative power, as appears now in the Nuns, and formerly in so many convents of Monks, whose Prefect for the most part excelled the others not in the dignity of the priesthood, but in the humility of his ministry, as is clear (omitting other instances) in D. Benedict, of whom we read that he was an Abbot, that is, the Father of Monks, but not a priest, as Suarez notes num. 3. et D. Bonavent. in cap. 7. nostrae Regulae: Nevertheless, since the stronger and more efficacious way of coercing faults is through the power of Jurisdiction, and since it can be exercised excellently together with the Power of Dominion, it was fitting that both be joined in the Praelates of Religions, as now almost everywhere it has grown strong by the usage of the Nations.
HABES secundo, illam non debere necessario, sed decere esse potestatem iurisdictionis; nam licet potestate dominativa quisque sufficienter contineatur in religiosa observatione, ut patet nunc in Monialibus, et olim in tot Monachorum conventibus, quorum Praefectus, ut plurimum, non facerdotii dignitate, sed ministerii humilitate caeteris praestabat, ut clarum est (caeteris omissis) in D. Benedicto, quem fuisse Abbatem, scilicet Patrem Monachorum, non autem sacerdotem, legimus, ut notat Suarez num. 3. et D. Bonavent. in cap. 7. nostrae Regulae: Attamen cum modus validior et efficacior coercendi culpas sit per potestatem Iurisdictionis, et cum optime cum Potestate Dominii possit exerceri, decuit utramque in Religionum Praelatis coniungi, ut nunc ubique fere Gentium usu inolevit.
But this he urges the more strongly, because now most convents of men are exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Bishops, and it would be arduous to govern these either by the supreme Pontiff alone, or by those whom he delegates, since these delegations, being frequent and extraneous, would be liable to various exceptions, and would hinder rather than help.
Hoc autem eo fortius urget, quod plerique nunc virorum conventus ab Episcoporum Iurisdictione eximantur, quos arduum esset gubernari vel a solo summo Pontifice, vel ab his, quos delegatet, cum delegationes hae frequentes, et extraneae, variis forent exceptionibus obnoxiae; officerentque potius, quam prodessent.
HABES thirdly, that the power of regular Praelation ought to be Monarchical; both because the Government of the Church, being the most perfect, is such, as the Seraphic Doctor inculcates so often and everywhere; and the fellowship of Religious is (so to speak) a homogeneous part of the ecclesiastical government, the rather because it continually applies itself to the acquiring of perfection, the attainment of which would be not a little delayed if it depended on a multitude, not on unity: Add that the Praelates of Religions ought to succeed into the place and the paternal affection; but one family cannot have several fathers.
HABES tertio, Potestatem praelationis regularis debere esse Monarchicam; tum quod Regimen Ecclesiae, quippe perfectissimum, tale sit, ut toties ubique inculcat Seraphicus Doctor; Religiosorum autem convictus est pars (ut ita dicam) homogenea Ecclesiastici regiminis, eoque potius, quod acquirendae perfectioni iugiter incumbat, cuius assecutio non modice retardaretur, si a multitudine, non ab unitate penderet: Adde Religionum Praelatos in locum, et affectum paternum debere succedere; unius autem familiae nequeunt plures esse patres.