Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged in articles
D. Thomas says an article is named from ἄρθρον, which signifies the fitting together of the parts for motion: St. Bonaventure acknowledges this too, question 1. article 3. Calepinus, however, took the name from artus, a joint, because it is a particle into which the joints, or the members of the body, are resolved; and it is called articulus from arctando, constraining, a term applied both actively and passively to the mysteries to be believed: passively indeed, because it is a thing constrained, and just as the knots in the body are the parts into which the joints, or members, are resolved; so the articles are, as it were, the first principles into which the parts of the whole habit of FAITH are resolved: actively, however, because they constrain to belief.
An credibilia recte per articulos sint disposita.
D. Thomas, articulum, ait nominari a ἄρθρον, quod significat coaptationem partium ad motum: Id agnoscit etiam S. Bonav. quaest. 1. art. 3. Calepinus vero a nomine artus sumpsit, eo quod sit particula, in quam resolvuntur artus, seu membra corporis, dicitur vero articulus ab arctando, quod active, et passive applicitum est mysteriis credibilibus: Passive quidem; quia est quid arctatum, et sicuti nodi in corpore, sunt partes in quas artus, seu membra resolvuntur; ita articuli sunt veluti prima principia, in quae resolvuntur partes totius habitus Fidei: Active vero, quia arctant ad credendum.
HENCE St. Bonaventure gathers that the articles of faith are the first principles in faith, into which all the objects of belief are resolved, in the way that the joints are in the body, into which the members are resolved, even the tiniest of the fingers; and just as in the sciences, and in acts, there are first principles into which the conclusions are resolved, nor are those resolved into others, as Caspens also notes, disp. 1. sect. 12. Likewise they are the first distinguishers of the object of belief, in the way that the articles in Grammar distinguish the genders, and the cases. And in Rhetoric an article is called the distinction that is made in the science, and in the uttering. Since, therefore, the sciences, and the arts are the handmaids of Theology, as St. Bonaventure splendidly demonstrates in his opusc. On the reduction of the arts to Theology, for that reason it received the name of article, to signify the first heads, and principles into which all things believed are resolved, which are called the object of faith. Hence the Seraphic Doctor praises the definition of an article handed down by Richard of St. Victor: An article is an indivisible truth about God, constraining us to believe. It is called an indivisible truth, because things believed are ultimately resolved into the articles, for resolution stops at the indivisible. It is called constraining, etc., for it constrains, as a directive rule, toward all things to be believed. See Caspens, Cardinal de Lugo, Morandus, and others agreeing.
HINC colligit S. Bonav. articulos fidei esse prima principia in fide, in quae resolvuntur omnia obiecta credibilia ad modum, quo articuli in corpore sunt, in quos resolvuntur membra, etiam minuta digitorum; et sicuti in scientiis, et actibus prima principia sunt, in quae resolvuntur conclusiones, nec illa resolvuntur in alia, ut notat etiam Caspens. disp. 1. sect. 12. Itidem sunt primo distinguentes obiectum credibile ad modum, quo articuli in Grammaticis distinguunt genera, et casus. Et in Rhetoricis vocatur articulos distinctio, quae fit in scientia, et prolatione. Quoniam igitur scientiae, et artes sunt Theologiae ancillae, ut egregie demonstrat S. Bonav. opusc. De reductione artium ad Theologiam, ideo accepit nomen articuli ad significanda prima capita, et principia, in quae omnia credita resolvuntur, quae dicuntur obiectum fidei. Hinc S. Doctor laudat definitionem articuli, traditam a Richardo Victorino: Articulus est veritas indivisibilis de Deo, arctans nos ad credendum. Dicitur veritas indivisibilis, quia ultimo credita resolvuntur in articulos, resolutio enim stat ad indivisibile. Dicitur arctans, etc. arctat enim, ut regula directiva ad omnia credibilia. Vide Caspensem, Cardinalem de Lugo, Morandum, et alios consentientes.
The Seraphic Doctor OBJECTS to himself against this definition, first, because an article is a divisible proposition.
OBIICIT sibi contra hanc definitionem S. Doct. primo, quia articulus est propositio divisibilis.
HE ANSWERS that it is indivisible formally, because it is not divided into other articles, as credible things.
RESPONDET, esse indivisibilem formaliter, quia non dividitur in alios articulos, ut credibiles.
He objects second. If an article is an indivisible truth. Therefore it is one article, because truth is one. Then truth is God: Therefore it is not about God.
OBIICIT secundo. Si articulus est veritas indivisibilis. Ergo est unus articulus, quia una est veritas. Deinde veritas est Deus: Ergo non est de Deo.
The Seraphic Doctor answers that an article is a truth as it is compared to something about God to be asserted, as that God is one; that there is a Trinity, etc.; and thus God is the subject of these truths.
RESPONDET S. Doct. articulum esse veritatem, prout comparatur ad aliquid de Deo asserendum, ut esse Deum unum; esse Trinitatem, etc. et ita Deus est subiectum harum veritatum.
He objects third. Among the articles there are some that are not about God, as the Resurrection of the flesh. It is answered that the resurrection of the flesh pertains to the Divine power.
OBIICIT tertio. Inter articulos sunt aliqui, qui non sunt de Deo, ut Resurrectio carnis. Respondetur, carnis resurrectionem esse de virtute Divina.
He objects fourth. Because the articles of faith do not convince by reasonings: Therefore they do not constrain to believe. HE ANSWERS that they constrain the faithful who are enlightened, by the authority of the revealer; they constrain indeed not by compelling; but by removing every ambiguity: they constrain also by obliging; and by restricting, and by resolving into distinct principles the object of faith.
OBIICIT quarto. Quia articuli fidei non convincunt rationibus: Ergo non arctant ad credendum. RESPONDET, arctare fideles illuminatos ex authoritate revelantis; arctant vero non cogendo; sed omnem tollendo ambiguitatem: arctant etiam obligando; et restringendo, et resolvendo in principia distincta obiectum fidei.
Presently the Seraphic Doctor, question 2., hands down another definition of the Article from D. Isidore. An article is a perception of Divine truth, tending to it. And he explains it thus: It is called a perception of Divine truth causally, because it is that by which we perceive the first truths of faith. It is called tending to God himself, whereby he shows that faith directs the will to God, to whom we are roused by the articles of faith. From this the Seraphic Doctor deduces the definition of the article, as it is the object of faith formed.
Mox S. Doct. quaest. 2. tradit aliam definitionem Articuli ex D. Isidoro. Articulus est perceptio Divinae veritatis, tendens in ipsam. Sic autem declarat: Dicitur perceptio Divinae veritatis causaliter, quia est id, quo primas fidei veritates percipimus. Dicitur tendens in ipsum Deum, quo ostendit fidem dirigere voluntatem in Deum, in quem excitamur fidei articulis. Ex quo deducit S. Doct. definiti articulum, prout est obiectum fidei formatae.
By this exposition the oppositions that are made against this definition collapse. See St. Bonaventure.
HAC expositione ruunt oppositiones, quae contra hanc definitionem fiunt. Vide S. Bonav.
The ORDER of the things to be believed is given in the Symbol. Now the Symbol signifies a judgment, or mark, by which others may be distinguished from one another, and the bringing together of many into one, as D. Bonaventure notes, disp. 25. question 1. For the Symbol is said from Syn, which is together; and bole, which is opinion; hence a Symbol is the opinion of many, constituted out of several articles, by which the faithful are set apart from the unfaithful, like a watchword, as Valencia also notes, disp. 1. question 1. p. 5., from Rufinus in his exposition of the Symbol, and Cassian, book 6. de Incarn. to Leo the Pope. See also Tanner, disp. 8.
ORDO credibilium in Symbolo habetur. Significat autem Symbolum iudicium, sive notam, qua alii ab aliis dignosci queant, et collationem plurium in unum, ut notat D. Bonav. disp. 25. quaest. 1. dicitur enim Symbolum a Syn, quod est simul; et bole, quod est sententia; unde Symbolum est plurium sententia, constituta e pluribus articulis, quibus fideles ab infidelibus, veluti tessera, secernuntur, ut advertit etiam Valentia disp. 1. quaest. 1. p. 5. ex Ruffino in expositione Symboli, et Cassiano lib. 6. de Incarn. ad Leonem P. Vide etiam Tannerum disp. 8.
Now there is a THREEFOLD Symbol in the Church, as D. Bonaventure notes on the cited 5th question. The first is that of the Apostles, which is recited in the office. That it was composed by the twelve Apostles the old Fathers commonly assert; Clement I. epistle 1. Irenaeus book 1. chapter 2. Tertullian in the praescriptiones, Ambrose epistle 81. Rufinus in the exposition, Jerome epistle to Pammach. and on the errors of John of Jerusalem, Chrysostom homilies 1. and 2. on the Symbol, Augustine sermons 115. and 180. de tempore, Leo sermon 11. on the Passion of the Lord, and epistle 13. to Pulcheria, and with them St. Bonaventure and others.
TRIPLEX autem Symbolum existit in Ecclesia, ut notat D. Bonav. ad 5. quaest. cit. Primum est Apostolorum, quod recitatur in officio. Hoc vero a duodecim Apostolis compositum asserunt communiter Patres veteres; Clemens I. epist. 1. Irenaeus lib. 1. cap. 2. Tertullianus in praescriptionibus, Ambros. epist. 81. Ruffinus in expositione, Hieron. epist. ad Pammach. et de erroribus Ioan. Hierosol. Chrysost. homil. 1. et 2. in Symb. August. serm. 115. et 180. de tempore, Leo serm. 11. de Passione Domini, et epist. 13. ad Pulcheriam, et cum eis S. Bonav. et alii.
The Seraphic Doctor adds, with Augustine and Leo above, that each Apostle set forth one article.
Addit S. Doct. cum August. et Leone supra, singulos Apostolos apposuisse unum articulum.
The SECOND Symbol is Athanasius's, which, as the Seraphic Doctor says, was drawn up chiefly against Arius. It is the one that is recited at the first Hour of Sunday. So testify Sts. Augustine on Psalm 120. in the enchiridion chapter 36. and book 5. on the Trinity, chapter 8. and epistle 174. and sermon 195. de Tempore. And St. Gregory Nazianzen on the praises of Athanasius; and, which is the chief point, the whole Church receives it. It is kept at Rome, written by him in Latin.
SECUNDUM Symbolum est Athanasii, quod, ut ait S. Doct. fuit contextum praecipue contra Arium. Est autem illud, quod recitatur in Hora prima Dominicae. Ita testantur SS. August. in Psalm. 120. in enchir. cap. 36. et lib. 5. de Trinitate, cap. 8. et epist. 174. et serm. 195. de Tempore. Et S. Gregorius Nazianzenus de laudibus Athanasii, et quod caput est, universa Ecclesia illud recipit. Habetur Romae, ab eo Latinae Scriptum.
The THIRD Symbol is the Nicene, which is recited in the Mass with certain additions in the first Council of Constantinople: Toledo 8. and Florence; and separately by the Church there was added that clause: proceeding from the Son (Filioque), as we saw p. 2. tract. 1. disp. 10. question 2.
TERTIUM Symbolum est Nycaenum, quod in Missa recitatur cum quibusdam additis in CC. Constantinopolitano primo: Toletano 8. et Florentino; et seorsim ab Ecclesia addita est illa particula: Filioque procedit, ut vidimus p. 2. tract. 1. disp. 10. quaest. 2.
SUITABLY, however, the Seraphic Doctor shows that faith was ordered into articles first, that it might be Catholic, that is, a universal uniformity of faith among all peoples, which Irenaeus taught before, book 1. chapter 3.
CONVENIENTER autem fidem in articulos ordinatam ostendit S. Doct. primo, ut esset Catholica, idest universalis uniformitas fidei apud omnes gentes, quod ante docuit Irenaeus lib. 1. cap. 3.
SECOND, because Faith had to be handed on to all, even the simple, which would not be explicit enough in general terms, nor could they be instructed by profuse eruditions, as D. Augustine teaches, book on faith, and the Symbol chapter 1., Cyril of Jerusalem catech. 5.
SECUNDO, quia omnibus, etiam simplicibus debuit tradi Fides, quae non satis esset explicita in genere, nec profusis eruditionibus potuissent erudiri, ut docent D. August. lib. de fide, et Symb. cap. 1. Cyrill. Hierosol. catech. 5.
Valencia adds, with D. Bonaventure, that it is useful, indeed most necessary, against heretics, to have a formula of faith, which, therefore, as heresies arose with the passage of the times, was enlarged, as I shall say in the following question.
ADDIT Valentia cum D. Bonav. utile, imo pernecessarium esse, contra haereticos habere formulam fidei, quae ideo, exurgentibus haeretibus temporum decursu, adaucta est, ut dicam quaestione sequenti.
The Seraphic Doctor shows, with D. Thom. question 1. article 8., that the articles are placed in a fitting order. He takes this order from the heads of things to be believed. First, then, the Divinity is to be believed: then the Trinity of persons: third the Humanity: fourth the Operations of the divinity; and last the works of Christ incarnate. As to the Divine essence, there is one article, just as the essence of God is most simple: I believe in God. As to the most holy Trinity, there are three articles. The first is: I believe in God the Father; the second is: In Jesus Christ, his son, etc.; the third: I believe in the Holy Spirit. As to the Operations of the deity, they are threefold. The first is the creation of nature, and it is noted when it is said: I believe in the Creator of heaven, and earth. The second is the bestowal of grace, and it is noted when it is said: I believe the Holy Catholic Church: the communion of Saints, the remission of sins. The third is the bestowal of glory: the resurrection of the flesh, life everlasting. And so there are seven articles concerning the divinity, looking to the divine essence itself: One looking to the Deity in itself; Three looking to the Trinity of persons, and the other three to the works of the Deity. Likewise concerning the humanity of Christ there are seven articles, according to the seven acts of the Redemption, which are ordered to our salvation. The first is the Incarnation, and on this is the article: Who was conceived of the Holy Spirit. The second is to be Born: Born of the Virgin Mary. The third is Redemption: He suffered under Pontius, and was crucified, dead, and buried. The fourth is the despoiling of hell: He descended into hell. The fifth is the triumph over death: On the third day he rose again from the dead. The sixth is the Ascension into heaven: He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father. The seventh is the Coming to judgment: From thence he shall come to judge, etc. See the Seraphic Doctor, dist. 25. question 1., assigning to each Apostle his own article.
ORDINE autem congruo articulos collocatos ostendit S. Doct. cum D. Thom. quaest. 1. art. 8. Sumit autem ordinem hunc e capitibus credendorum. Primum enim credenda est Divinitas: deinde Trinitas personarum: tertio Humanitas: quarto Operationes divinitatis; et ultimo opera Christi incarnati. Quoad Divinam essentiam, est unus articulus, sicut essentia Dei est simplicissima: Credo in Deum. Quoad Trinitatem sanctissimam, tres sunt articuli. Primus est: Credo in Deum Patrem, Secundus est: In Iesum Christum, filium eius, etc. Tertius: Credo in Spiritum Sanctum. Quoad Operationes deitatis, tripartitae sunt. Prima est naturae creatio, et notatur, cum dicitur: Credo in Creatorem caeli, et terrae. Secunda est, gratiae collatio, et notatur, cum dicitur: Credo Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam: Sanctorum communionem, remissionem peccatorum. Tertia est collatio gloriae: Carnis resurrectionem, vitam aeternam. Et sic septem sunt articuli circa divinitatem, respicientes ipsam divinam essentiam: Unus Deitatem in se; Tres respicientes Trinitatem personarum, et alii tres opera Deitatis. Similiter circa humanitatem Christi sunt septem articuli, secundum septem actus Redemptionis, qui ordinantur ad nostram salutem. Primus est Incarnatio, et de hoc est articulus: Qui conceptus est de Spiritu Sancto. Secundus est Nasci: Natus ex Maria Virgine. Tertius est Redemptio: Passus sub Pontio, et crucifixus, mortuus, et sepultus. Quartus est Inferni spoliatio: Descendit ad inferos. Quintus est triumphus de morte: Tertia die resurrexit a mortuis. Sextus est Ascensio in caelum: Ascendit ad caelos, sedet ad dexteram Patris. Septimus est Adventus ad iudicium: Inde venturus est iudicare, etc. Vide S. Doct. dist. 25. quaest. 1. singulis Apostolis proprium articulum: assignantem.
The Seraphic Doctor marvels that these fourteen articles are set forth in Apoc. 1., where Christ was seen among seven golden candlesticks, and he had in his right hand seven stars; now the stars are the heavenly articles of the deity: but the seven golden candlesticks, of earthly substance, yet precious, are the seven articles of the humanity. The same he teaches in Hexaemer. sermon 8. and in the Centilog. sect. 38. and in the Diaeta, chapter 5. title 3.
Hos quatuordecim articulos miratur S. Doct. expressos Apoc. 1. ubi inter septem candelabra aurea visus est Christus, et habebat ad dexteram septem stellas, sunt autem stellae articuli caelestes deitatis: At septem candelabra aurea, e terrena substantia, sed pretiosa, sunt septem humanitatis articuli. Eadem docet in Hexaemer. serm. 8. et in Centilog. sect. 38. et in Diaeta, cap. 5. titulo 3.
He notes, however, that the articles are reduced to twelve; for the first contains the Deity; and the first Person, who is the Fount of all the communications of the Deity; and the work of Creation, all of which St. Peter asserts; and so there are twelve articles in a broad sense. See the Seraphic Doctor.
ADVERTIT autem, reductos articulos in duodecim; nam primus continet Deitatem; et primam Personam, quae est Fons omnium communicationum Deitatis; et opus Creationis, quae omnia S. Petrus asserit, et ita duodecim sunt articuli, lato modo. Vide S. Doctorem.
Therefore the Seraphic Doctor proves the sufficiency of the Symbol first from Cassian book 6. de Incarn. to Pope Leo.
PROBAT igitur S. Doct. sufficientiam Symboli primo ex Cassiano lib. 6. de Incarn. ad Leonem Papam.
SECOND, because faith is concerned with God: Now God is regarded in two ways, either in himself, as One, and Three; or in the Humanity assumed. Again. The Deity is not known on the way, except through the works; now three of these are the chief ones, Creation, Gratification, and Glorification. But the works of the humanity are related in the Symbol, which, since it was composed by the Apostles, full of the Holy Spirit, there is no doubt that it is fitting; for they were the masters of the Catholic Church. And so, although fourteen can also be counted, as St. Bonaventure teaches, loc. cit., Scotus dist. 25. question 1., nevertheless they are reduced to twelve.
SECUNDO, quia fides versatur circa Deum: Dupliciter autem Deus respicitur, vel in se, ut Unus, et Trinus; vel in Humanitate assumpta. Rursus. Deitas non cognoscitur in via, nisi per opera; haec vero tria sunt praecipua, Creatio, Gratificatio, et Glorificatio. Opera vero humanitatis sunt relata in Symbolo, quod, cum ab Apostolis, plenis Spiritu Sancto compositum fuerit, non est dubium, quin congruum sit; fuere enim magistri Ecclesiae Catholicae. Itaque, licer quatuordecim possint etiam numerari, ut docent S. Bonav. loc. cit. Scotus dist. 25. quaest. 1. tamen ad duodecim rediguntur.
Valencia, however, loc. cit., Morand. q. 4., Cardinal Lugo disp. 3. sect. 4., observes that the Symbol is not Canonical Scripture, because it was composed by the Apostles, as a brief formula for professing the faith already possessed. You will wonder, here, that the Mystery of faith, that is, the Eucharist, is omitted. But it is included in the omnipotence. See D. Th. article 8. to 6. It is also enclosed in the Church.
OBSERVAT autem Valentia loc. cit. Morand. q. 4. Card. Lugo disp. 3. sect. 4. Symbolum non esse Scripturam Canonicam, quia compositum fuit ab Apostolis, tanquam formula brevis profitendi fidem, iam praehabitam. Miraberis, hic omitti Mysterium fidei, idest Eucharistiam Sed includitur in omnipotentia. Vide D. Th. art. 8. ad 6. Clauditur etiam in Ecclesia.