Doubt — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Doubt IV: Whether the third beatitude, Blessed are they that mourn, corresponds to the gift of knowledge
Since temporal things are possessed with excessive joy because the vileness of these things is not known, and heavenly things still, beneath the bitter rind of the letter, are found tasteless; hence the mind cannot acknowledge its blindness, and much less can the will turn it away by a salutary mourning:
Cum temporalia ideo cum laetitia nimia possideantur, quia harum vilitas ignoratur, et adhuc caelestia sub amaro litterae cortice insipida probentur; hinc nequit mens suam agnoscere caecitatem, multoque minus salutari luctu valet voluntas eam avertere:
Therefore the holy Doctors, St. Thomas here, St. Bonaventura, cap. 3. de septem Donis, assert that the third beatitude corresponds to the Gift of science.
Asserunt igitur SS. Doctores, S. Thomas hic, S. Bonaventura, cap. 3. de septem Donis, tertiam beatitudinem respondere Dono scientiae.
It is proved first from St. August. supra de sermone Domini in monte, cap. 9. Then, because the gift of science teaches one to pass right judgment on the creatures on account of which man is turned away from God and slides into miseries, and therefore to that right judgment of science there corresponds the mourning, whereby one is turned away from the evil of lust, and from the languor of concupiscence, and is converted to the evil of one's own blindness, to be bitterly bewailed, as that word of the Psalmist says: I shall reflect upon all my years in the bitterness of my soul. From this Gift of science also arises the reward of this beatitude, namely that supernal consolation, whereby man, having clearly seen the vanity of the creature,1 and tasting the goodness of God, is filled to the marrow. But this consolation is promised not to those who revel, but to those who mourn; nor can they mourn who do not pass through the gift of science to the contemplation of pure truth, as the Seraphic Doctor concludes here. 1 Editor's note: the print/OCR reads 'qua homo perspecta dens creaturae vanitatem' (djvu layer: 'qua homo pcrfpcta denscteatutz vanitatem'); 'dens' is a defective letterform or stray mark and is not Latin; rendered as 'having clearly seen the vanity of the creature' without it.
Probatur primo ex D. August. supra de sermone Domini in monte, cap. 9. Deinde, quia donum scientiae docet rectum ferre iudicium creaturarum, ob quas homo avertitur a Deo, et in miserias labitur, et ideo illi iudicio recto scientiae respondet luctus, quo avertitur a malo libidinis, et a languore concupiscentiae, et convertitur ad propriae caecitatis malum amare deflendum, ut dicat illud Psalmistae: Recogitabo omnes annos meos in amaritudine animae meae. Ex hoc etiam Dono scientiae oritur huius beatitudinis praemium, nimirum consolatio illa superna, qua homo perspecta creaturae vanitatem, et Dei gustans bonitatem, medullitus repletur. Verum haec consolatio non luxuriantibus, sed lugentibus promittitur, nec lugere queunt, qui per donum scientiae ad contemplationem purae veritatis non transeunt, ut concludit hic Seraphicus Doctor.