Disputation — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Disputation XXVII: On Theft and Robbery
THEFT and Robbery, allied by a close bond, spring from Avarice; both lie in wait for the advantages of peace and of Justice: Theft indeed fraudulently and secretly; Robbery openly and violently. The former is committed either by taking unjustly, or by detaining unjustly, or lastly by circumventing with guile. In either case every law is violated, and indeed the law of nature is transgressed, whose clear voice is: Do not to another what you would not have done to yourself. Likewise the Written Law of Exodus 20. forbids the unjust handling of another's property: Thou shalt not steal: but the Law of grace forbids theft all the more strongly, since it commands each one to give his own to the poor. Yet if, under the pressure of necessity, whereby things return to the common use, or by the command of the supreme Lord of all things, at whose nod all things are licit, another's property is handled — as befell the sons of Israël when they made off with the golden vessels of the AEgyptians — there is no sin, but rather merit of obedience is heaped up; though this merit, however agreeable to each, few attain. These matters I shall discuss, after I have given some preliminary warnings about dominion.
De Furto, et Rapina.
FURTUM, et Rapina germano foedere ex Avaritia ortum ducunt, ambo pacis, et Iustitiae emolumentis insidiantur; Furtum quidem fraudulenter, et clam; Rapina vero palam, et violenter. Prius committitur vel inique accipiendo, vel iniuste detinendo, vel denique dolose circumveniendo. Utroque omnis lex temeratur, et quidem naturae ius violatur, cuius clara vox est: Alteri ne feceris, quod tibi fieri non vis. Item et Lex Scripta Exodi 20. iniustam rei alienae contrectationem inhibet: Furtum non facies: Lex autem gratiae a fortiori furtum prohibet, cum suum pauperibus dare cuique praecipiat. Verum si urgente necessitate, qua res redeant in commune, vel iubente supremo rerum Domino, ad cuius nutum omnia licent, res aliena contrectatur, uti filiis Israël aurea AEgyptiorum vasa surripientibus contigerat, non peccatur, sed meritum potius obedientiae cumulatur; hoc tamen meritum, liceat cuique gratissimum, attingunt pauci. Haec discutiam, postquam de dominio aliqua praemonuero.
Within this disputation
- Question I: What dominion is
- Question II: Whether it is lawful to have private dominion over things
- Question III: What theft is
- Question V: Whether theft is mortal when, after many tiny thefts, a further small one makes the whole grave
- Question VI: Whether in extreme, or urgent, necessity it is lawful to take what belongs to another
- Question VII: On the thefts of religious
- Question VIII: Whether men can be reduced to slavery, and sold
- Question IX: Whether slaves can wrest themselves from their masters
- Question X: Whether it is lawful, by private authority, to recover what is ours
- Question XI: On the punishment of thieves
- Question XII: On the restitution of thefts