Question — Bontempi, Palladium Theologicum V · from Schola Thomistica
Question VIII: Who is the judge from whom, and to whom, appeal is made
The Judge from whom the appeal is made must be such that he has begun to burden the accused; wherefore whether he be a delegate or an Ordinary, provided he not be supreme in rendering the judgment, from him appeal is licitly made; I said: unless he be supreme, etc., because from the Supreme Pontiff it is licit to appeal not even to a General Council; as was said, where concerning excommunication of the Bullae Coenae.
Quis sit Iudex a Quo, et ad Quem appelletur.
Iudex, a quo fit appellatio, debet talis esse, ut reum coeperit gravare; quare sive sit delegatus, sive Ordinarius, modo non sit in ferendo iudicio supremus, ab ipso licite appellatur; dixi: nisi sit supremus, etc. quia a Summo Pontifice nequidem ad Generale Concilium licet appellare; ut dictum est, ubi de excom. Bullae Coenae.
But where the Judge has rendered sentence, interposing that clause: omni appellatione remota, or other equivalent terms, appeal cannot be made from him; because such a sentence removes all impediments of execution, unless in some case of law mention of appeal be expressly made.
Ubi autem Iudex tulit sententiam, interponendo clausulam illam: omni appellatione remota, vel aliis terminis aequivalentibus, ab eo nequit fieri appellatio; quia talis sententia removet omnia impedimenta executionis, nisi in casu aliquo iuris expressa fiat mentio appellationis.
But if the sentence be actually committed to execution, no appeal is given from the execution, unless he exceed in executing, Cap. pastoralis, §. etsi, de officio iudic. deleg. et leg. ab executione, Cod. quorum appellation. etc.
Si vero executioni sententia actu mandetur, ab executione non datur appellatio, nisi excedat in exequendo, Cap. pastoralis, §. etsi, de officio iudic. deleg. et leg. ab executione, Cod. quorum appellation. etc.
The Judge ad quem must be the proximate superior of the Judge from whom the appeal is made, and thus grade by grade up to the supreme judge, as is had in the decree of the Sacred Congregation related above. But if it be done otherwise, the adverse party objecting, the appeal is held null; yet if it be done through error and in good faith, the cause is devolved to the competent Judge, leg. 1. ff. de appellat.
Iudex ad quem, debet esse proxime superior Iudice, a quo appellatur, et sic fit gradatim usque ad supremum iudicem, ut habetur relato decreto Sacrae Congreg. Quod si aliter fiat, parte adversa se opponente, appellatio nulla habetur; si tamen ex errore, et bona fide fiat, devolvitur causa ad Iudicem competentem, leg. 1. ff. de appellat.
These things, however, are not understood of the Pope, to whom, as also to his Legate, the legation still remaining, it is licit to appeal, the intermediate Judges omitted, c. dilecti, 3. de appellat.; say the same if the middle Prelate be long absent, then the cause can be accelerated to another superior to him.
Haec tamen non intelliguntur de Papa, ad quem sicut et ad eius Legatum, legatione adhuc manente, licite, intermediis Iudicibus omissis, appellatur, c. dilecti, 3. de appellat. idem dic si Praelatus medius diu absit, tunc ad alium, eo superiorem, potest causa accelerari.
If the Pope has delegated someone to the cognizance of a particular cause, then the appeal is made to the Pope himself, not to his Legate a latere; let the same hold for every delegate judge, from whom the appeal is made immediately to the one delegating.
Si Papa aliquem delegavit ad cognitionem particularis causae, tunc ad ipsum Papam, non ad Legatum eius a latere fit appellatio; idem esto iudicium de omni delegato, a quo ad delegantem fit immediate appellatio.
The OFFICE, however, of the Judge ad quem is manifold. For first he must inquire of you, whether anything substantial is lacking to the appeal?
OFFICIUM autem Iudicis ad quem multiplex est. Primo enim inquirere te debet, num nil substantiale desit appellationi?
The SUBSTANTIAL things, however, required for a legitimate appeal are: first, the expression of the name of the appellant party, as also of the judge, a quo; this however is only congruous; then the mention of the place and time at which the appeal was made, that it may be known whether at the due time, etc. Then that it be committed to writing, unless it be made in continenti; yet if sufficient proof of it can be had elsewhere, it may be omitted.
SUBSTANTIALIA autem, ad appellationem legitimam requisita, sunt primo expressio nominis partis appellantis, sicut et iudicis, a quo; hoc tamen tantum congruum est; deinde mentio loci, et temporis, quo facta fuit appellatio, ut sciatur, num debito tempore, etc. Deinde ut scripturae mandetur, nisi fiat in continenti; si tamen eius sufficiens probatio aliunde possit haberi, potest omitti.
THIRD, the cause must be expressed, except in the definitive sentence, in which it suffices to intimate that one appeals from an unjust cause. Vide the dictum, quaest. 146. num. 17. et seq.
TERTIO debet causa exprimi, nisi in sententia definitiva, in qua sufficit intimare, se ab iniusta causa appellare, Vide dictum, quaest. 146. num. 17. et seq.
The appellant must also seek from the Judge, a quo, the Apostoli, or letters of notification, by which he signifies that he has had recourse to the appeal; of these letters, however, there are various species; for some are Testimoniales, by which the appellant, in the absence of his Judge, attests before upright and trustworthy men the said appeal: Others are Reverentiales, by which the judge, a quo, attests that out of reverence for the judge, ad quem, he has neither delayed nor impeded the appeal: Finally others are Refutatoriae, by which the appeal, as light and frivolous, is repelled, these having been seen.
DEBET etiam appellans Apostolos, seu litteras nunciatorias petere a Iudice, a quo, quibus significet se detulisse appellationi; harum autem litterarum variae sunt species; aliae enim sunt Testimoniales, quibus appellans, absente suo Iudice, coram probis, et fide dignis viris attestatur dictam appellationem: Aliae sunt Reverentiales quibus testatur iudex, a quo, se ob reverentiam iudicis, ad quem, appellationem non distulisse, nec impediisse; Aliae denique sunt Refutatoriae, quibus tanquam levis, et frivola, appellatio retunditur, his visis.
SECOND, the Judge, ad quem, must diligently examine the justice of the appeal, whether in it there was a burden to the accused, whether the cause was deferred, etc.
SECUNDO Iudex, ad quem debet diligenter examinare iustitiam appellationis, num in ea fuerit gravamen rei, num causa deferta, etc.
THIRD, whatever has been transacted by the Judge, a quo, he must take care to have transferred to himself, unless it contributes nothing to the declaration or cognition of the cause, cap. Exhibita, de iudiciis; he must, however, diligently inspect whatever things have been established against the Accused, and, as far as can be done, consult the reputation of the Judge, a quo. Other things more numerous, vide at Bictus in the places cited, Elizaeus, tract. 11. throughout, Farin. tract. de Iudice, quaest. 5. et seqq. and others among these.
TERTIO quicquid a Iudice, a quo actitatum est, ad se curet transferri, nisi nil ad causae declarationem, vel cognitionem testentur cap. Exhibita, de iudiciis; debet autem diligenter inspicere, quaecumque in Reum statuta sunt, et quantum fieri potest, consulere famae Iudicis a quo. Alia plura vide apud Bictum locis citatis, Elizaeum, tract. 11. per totum, Farin. tract. de Iudice, quaest. 5. et seqq. et alios apud istos.